\n
Key Word(s): BeautifulSoup, Scraping, Data Collection
CS109A Introduction to Data Science
Lab 2 Scraping¶
Harvard University
Summer 2018
Instructors: Pavlos Protopapas and Kevin Rader
Lab Instructors: Rahul Dave
Authors: Rahul Dave, David Sondak, Will Claybaugh and Pavlos Protopaps
## RUN THIS CELL TO GET THE RIGHT FORMATTING
from IPython.core.display import HTML
def css_styling():
styles = open("../../styles/cs109.css", "r").read()
return HTML(styles)
css_styling()
%matplotlib inline
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
import seaborn.apionly as sns
pd.set_option('display.width', 500)
pd.set_option('display.max_columns', 100)
/Users/eleni/anaconda2/envs/bunny/lib/python3.6/site-packages/seaborn/apionly.py:6: UserWarning: As seaborn no longer sets a default style on import, the seaborn.apionly module is deprecated. It will be removed in a future version. warnings.warn(msg, UserWarning)
import time, requests
In this lab, we'll scrape Goodread's Best Books list:
https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/1.Best_Books_Ever?page=1 .
We'll walk through scraping the list pages for the book names/urls
Table of Contents¶
- Learning Goals
- Exploring the Web pages and downloading them
- Parse the page, extract book urls
- Parse a book page, extract book properties
- Set up a pipeline for fetching and parsing
Learning Goals¶
Understand the structure of a web page. Use Beautiful soup to scrape content from these web pages.
This lab corresponds to lectures 2, 3 and 4 and maps on to homework 1 and further.
1. Exploring the web pages and downloading them¶
We're going to see the structure of Goodread's best books list. We'll use the Developer tools in chrome, safari and firefox have similar tools available
To getch this page we use the requests
module. But are we allowed to do this? Lets check:
https://www.goodreads.com/robots.txt
Yes we are.
URLSTART="https://www.goodreads.com"
BESTBOOKS="/list/show/1.Best_Books_Ever?page="
url = URLSTART+BESTBOOKS+'1'
print(url)
page = requests.get(url)
https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/1.Best_Books_Ever?page=1
We can see properties of the page. Most relevant are status_code
and text
. The former tells us if the web-page was found, and if found , ok. (See lecture notes.)
page.status_code # 200 is good
200
page.text[:5000]
'\n\n\n\n\n\nBest Books Ever (54400 books)\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n
\n- \n \n Sign In\n \n
\n- \n \n Join\n \n
\n\n \n Sign up\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n View profile\n \n\n\n\n\n
\n- \n \n \n Profile\n \n \n
\n- \n \n Friends\n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n Groups\n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n Discussions\n \n
\n- \n \n Comments\n \n
\n- \n \n Reading Challenge\n \n
\n- \n \n Kindle Notes & Highlights\n \n
\n- \n \n Quotes\n \n
\n- \n \n Favorite genres\n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n Friends’ recommendations\n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n Account settings\n \n
\n- \n \n Help\n \n
\n- \n \n Sign out\n \n
\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.\n\n\n Start by marking “1984” as Want to Read:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n
\n- \n \n
\n- \n \n
\n- \n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n Other editions\n \n\n\n\n\n Enlarge cover\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n Error rating book. Refresh and try again.\n\n\n Rate this book\n\n\n Clear rating\n\n\n \n 1 of 5 stars\n \n \n 2 of 5 stars\n \n \n 3 of 5 stars\n \n \n 4 of 5 stars\n \n \n 5 of 5 stars\n \n\n\n \n Open Preview\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n See a Problem?\n
\n\n\n\n We’d love your help.\n Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of\n \n 1984\n \n by George Orwell.\n\n \n\n\n\n Thanks for telling us about the problem.\n
\n \n\n\n\n \n Not the book you’re looking for?\n \n\n \n\n Preview —\n \n 1984\n \n by George Orwell\n
\n\n\n\n 1984\n
\n\n
\n\n \n by\n \n \n\n\n \n \n George Orwell\n \n \n ,\n\n\n \n \n Erich Fromm\n \n \n \n (Afterword)\n \n\n \n\n \n \n 1984\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 4.16\n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n Rating details\n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n \n \n 2,416,552\n \n Ratings\n \n \n ·\n \n \n \n 53,688\n \n Reviews\n \n\n\n\n\n \n Among the seminal texts of the 20th century,\n \n Nineteen Eighty-Four\n \n is a rare work that grows more haunting as its futuristic purgatory becomes more real. Published in 1949, the book offers political satirist George Orwell\'s nightmare vision of a totalitarian, bureaucratic world and one poor stiff\'s attempt to find individuality. The brilliance of the novel is Orwell\'s presc\n \n \n Among the seminal texts of the 20th century,\n \n Nineteen Eighty-Four\n \n is a rare work that grows more haunting as its futuristic purgatory becomes more real. Published in 1949, the book offers political satirist George Orwell\'s nightmare vision of a totalitarian, bureaucratic world and one poor stiff\'s attempt to find individuality. The brilliance of the novel is Orwell\'s prescience of modern life--the ubiquity of television, the distortion of the language--and his ability to construct such a thorough version of hell. Required reading for students since it was published, it ranks among the most terrifying novels ever written.\n \n \n ...more\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n Get A Copy\n
\n\n
\n- \n \n Kindle Store\n \n
\n- \n \n Amazon\n \n
\n- \n
\n\n \n Online Stores\xa0▾\n \n\n\n \n Audible\n \n\n
\n \n Barnes & Noble\n \n
\n \n Kobo\n \n
\n \n Apple iBooks\n \n
\n \n Google Play\n \n
\n \n Abebooks\n \n
\n \n Book Depository\n \n
\n \n Indigo\n \n
\n \n Alibris\n \n
\n \n Better World Books\n \n
\n \n IndieBound\n \n- \n \n Libraries\n \n
\n\n\n \n Or buy for\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n Mass Market Paperback\n \n ,\n \n Signet Classics\n \n ,\n \n 328 pages\n \n\n\n Published\n July 1st 1950\n by New American Library\n\n\n (first published June 8th 1949)\n \n\n \n More Details...\n \n\n\n\n \n ...Less Detail\n \n \n edit details\n \n\n\n\n Original Title\n\n\n Nineteen Eighty-Four\n\n\n\n\n ISBN\n\n\n 0451524934\n \n (ISBN13:\n \n 9780451524935\n \n )\n \n\n\n\n\n Edition Language\n\n\n English\n\n\n\n\n Characters\n\n\n \n Winston Smith\n \n ,\n \n Big Brother\n \n ,\n \n O\'Brien\n \n ,\n \n Emmanuel Goldstein\n \n ,\n \n Tom Parsons\n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n \n ,\n \n Syme\n \n ,\n \n Julia\n \n \n \n ...less\n \n \n \n\n\n setting\n\n \n
\n\n\n\n Literary Awards\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n Friend Reviews\n
\n\n\n\n \n To see what your friends thought of this book,\n \n please sign up.\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Reader Q&A\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n To ask other readers questions about\n \n 1984\n \n ,\n \n please sign up\n \n .\n\n\n\n\n Popular Answered Questions\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n
\n- \n \n \n \n 149 likes\n \n \n ·\n \n like\n \n \n
\n- \n \n 4 years ago\n \n
\n- \n \n See all 73 answers\n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Bigsoph\n \n \n \n \n \n Maybe you are expecting a happy ending, where love triumphs over all and human spirit is set free?\n\n
\n If this was made into a movie now, they would likely\n \n …more\n \n \n \n \n Maybe you are expecting a happy ending, where love triumphs over all and human spirit is set free?\n
\n If this was made into a movie now, they would likely cast Will Smith as Winston and have him overthrow the government and rescue Julia\n \n (less)\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n flag\n \n\n\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n
\n- \n \n \n \n 28 likes\n \n \n ·\n \n like\n \n \n
\n- \n \n 4 years ago\n \n
\n- \n \n See all 21 answers\n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Niklas\n \n \n \n \n \n Big Brother is the personification of the state of Oceania. The book explains that the existence of Big Brother is necessary because it is easier to\n \n …more\n \n \n \n Big Brother is the personification of the state of Oceania. The book explains that the existence of Big Brother is necessary because it is easier to love a person than an organisation, and that the name "Big Brother" was selected because it plays on family loyalty.\n \n (less)\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n flag\n \n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n Lists with This Book\n \n
\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Community Reviews\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n (showing 1-30)\n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n Rating details\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n Sort\n \n : Default\n \n \n\n\n \n |\n \n\n\n \n \n Filter\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n May 28, 2007\n \n \n \n Bill Kerwin\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n
\n This book is far from perfect. Its characters lack depth, its rhetoric is sometimes didactic, its plot (well, half of it anyway) was lifted from Zumyatin’s\n \n We\n \n , and the lengthy Goldstein treatise shoved into the middle is a flaw which alters the structure of the novel like a scar disfigures a face.\n
\n
\n But in the long run, all that does not matter, because George Orwell got it right.\n
\n
\n Orwell, a socialist who fought against Franco, watched appalled as the great Soviet experiment was reduced to a totalita\n \n \n \n
\n This book is far from perfect. Its characters lack depth, its rhetoric is sometimes didactic, its plot (well, half of it anyway) was lifted from Zumyatin’s\n \n We\n \n , and the lengthy Goldstein treatise shoved into the middle is a flaw which alters the structure of the novel like a scar disfigures a face.\n
\n
\n But in the long run, all that does not matter, because George Orwell got it right.\n
\n
\n Orwell, a socialist who fought against Franco, watched appalled as the great Soviet experiment was reduced to a totalitarian state, a repressive force equal in evil to Fascist Italy or Nazi Germany. He came to realize that ideology in an authoritarian state is nothing but a distraction, a shiny thing made for the public to stare at. He came to realize that the point of control was more control, the point of torture was more torture, that the point of all their "alternative facts" was to fashion a world where people would no longer possess even a word for truth.\n
\n
\n \n If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.\n \n
\n
\n Orwell’s vision of the world is grim; too grim, some would argue, for it may deprive the faint-hearted among us of hope. But Orwell never wanted to take away hope. No, he wished to shock our hearts into resistance by showing us the authoritarian nightmare achieved: a monument of stasis, a tribute to surveillance and control.\n
\n
\n Here, in the USA, in 2017, our would-be totalitarians are a long way from stasis. Right now they’re stirring up chaos and confusion, spreading lies and then denying they spread them, hoping to gaslight us into a muddle of helplessness and inactivity. They are trying to destroy a vigorous democracy, and they know it will take much chaos and confusion to bring that democracy down. They hate us most when we march together, when we occupy senate offices and jam the congressional switchboard, when we congregate in pubs and coffee houses and share our outrage and fear, for they know that freedom thrives on solidarity and resistance, and that solidarity and resistance engender love and hope. They much prefer it when we brood in solitude, despairing and alone.\n
\n
\n Which reminds me...one of the things we should\n \n never\n \n do is brood about the enemy’s ideology (\n \n Is Steve Bannon a Fascist? A Nazi? A Stalinist?\n \n ), for while we try to discern his “ideological goals,” the enemy is busy pulling on his boots, and his boots are made with hobnails, with heel irons, and equipped with toecaps of steel.\n
\n
\n Finally, it does not matter who heads up the authoritarian state: a bully boy like Mussolini, a strutting coprophiliac like Hitler, a Napoleonic pig like Stalin, or a brainless dancing bear like Trump. Whatever the current incarnation of “Big Brother” may be, the goal is always the same:\n\n \n A nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans, perpetually working, fighting, triumphing, persecuting - three hundred million people all with the same face.\n \n\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Dec 07, 2007\n \n \n \n Silvana\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n \n Recommends it for:\n \n \n everyone\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n classics\n \n ,\n \n dark-and-depressing\n \n ,\n \n mine-mine-mine\n \n ,\n \n scary-stuff\n \n ,\n \n dead-trees\n \n\n\n \n \n WAR IS PEACE.\n\n
\n
\n FREEDOM IS SLAVERY.\n
\n
\n IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.\n
\n
\n Those words keep sounding in my head since I read this book. Gosh, probably the most haunting not to mention frightening book I\'ve ever read. 1984 should also be included in the horror genre.\n
\n
\n 1984 describes a Utopia. Not Thomas More\'s version of Utopia, but this is one is the antithesis, i.e. Dystopia. Imagine living in a country, whose leaders apply a totalitarian system in regulating their citizen, in the most extreme ways, which make Hitler\n \n \n WAR IS PEACE.\n
\n
\n FREEDOM IS SLAVERY.\n
\n
\n IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.\n
\n
\n Those words keep sounding in my head since I read this book. Gosh, probably the most haunting not to mention frightening book I\'ve ever read. 1984 should also be included in the horror genre.\n
\n
\n 1984 describes a Utopia. Not Thomas More\'s version of Utopia, but this is one is the antithesis, i.e. Dystopia. Imagine living in a country, whose leaders apply a totalitarian system in regulating their citizen, in the most extreme ways, which make Hitler, Mao, Stalin and that old bloke in\n \n V for Vendetta\n \n look like sissies.\n
\n
\n Working, eating, drinking, sleeping, talking, thinking, procreating...in short living, all are controlled by the state. Any hint of obedience or dislike can be detected by various state apparatus such as the Thought Police, telescreen, or even your children, who will not hesitate to betray you to the authorities. Even language is modified in such ways that you cannot express yourself, since individualism is a crime.\n
\n
\n The past is controlled, rewritten into something that will strengthen the incumbent ruler. Who controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present, controls the past. There is no real truth. The "truth" is what the state says it is. Black is white, 2+2=5, if the state says so.\n
\n
\n The world in 1984 is divided into three states, originated from the ashes from World War II: Oceania (British Isles, the Americas, Pacific, Australia), Eurasia (Europe & Russia), and Eastasia (the rest of it). Continuous warfare between those three (who hold similar ideologies) is required to keep the society\'s order and peace. Si vis pacem para bellum. That\'s describes the first slogan.\n
\n
\n The second slogan, freedom is slavery, means the only way to be free is by letting you lose yourself and to be integrated within the Party. That way, you\'ll be indestructible and immortal.\n
\n
\n Ignorance is strength, means the division on high, middle, low classes in society will never be changed. The middle wants to be the high and they\'ll act "on behalf of the low" to dethrone the high. Afterwards, a new middle class arises, all will change except the low. The high and middle make and uphold the law, the low (proletarian) is just too stupid to revolt. The state maintains its structure by torture, intimidation, violence, and brainwashing.\n
\n
\n Blimey, Orwell\'s Animal Farm is already depressing, but 1984 gives "depression" a new meaning, at least for me.\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 81 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Seif Ahmed\n \n \n Scary and more realistic point of view fir certain countries nowadays\n \n\n
\n \n Sep 24, 2018 12:33AM\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Xue Yan\n \n \n You’re right! I also read Animal Farm a few years ago, but Orwell takes the dystopian society to another level in 1984. The Party definitely reminded\n \n \n You’re right! I also read Animal Farm a few years ago, but Orwell takes the dystopian society to another level in 1984. The Party definitely reminded me of the dictators in history...only WORSE! His novel really surprised me and made me reflect on aspects of our society today. I’m glad you enjoyed it!\n \n \n ...more\n \n\n
\n \n Sep 30, 2018 10:40AM\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jul 28, 2007\n \n \n \n Dave\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n In George Orwell\'s 1984, Winston Smith is an open source developer who writes his code offline because his ISP has installed packet sniffers that are regulated by the government under the Patriot Act. It\'s really for his own protection, though. From, like, terrorists and DVD pirates and stuff. Like every good American, he drinks Coca-Cola and his processed food has desensitized his palate to all but four flavors: sweet, salty-so-that-you-will-drink-more-coca-cola, sweet, and Cooler Ranch!(tm). H\n \n \n In George Orwell\'s 1984, Winston Smith is an open source developer who writes his code offline because his ISP has installed packet sniffers that are regulated by the government under the Patriot Act. It\'s really for his own protection, though. From, like, terrorists and DVD pirates and stuff. Like every good American, he drinks Coca-Cola and his processed food has desensitized his palate to all but four flavors: sweet, salty-so-that-you-will-drink-more-coca-cola, sweet, and Cooler Ranch!(tm). His benevolent overlords have provided him with some war happening somewhere for some reason so that he, and the rest of the population, can be sure that the government is really in his best interests. In fact, the news always has some story about Paris Hilton or yet another white girl who has been abducted by some evil bastard who is biologically wired by 200,000 years of human evolution to fuck 12-year-olds, but is socially conditioned to be obsessed with sex, yet also to feel guilty about it. This culminates into a distorted view of sexuality, and results in rape and murder, which both make for very good news topics. This, too, is in Winston\'s best interests because, while fear is healthy, thinking *too* much about his own mortality is strictly taboo, as it may lead to something dangerously insightful, and he might lose his taste for Coca Cola and breast implants. The television also plays on his fears of the unknown by exaggerating stereotypes of minorities and homosexuals, under the guise of celebrating "diversity", but even these images of being ghetto-fabulous and a lisping interior designer actually exist solely to promote racism and homophobia, which also prove to be efficient distractions.\n\n
\n
\n For some reason, Winston gets tired of eating recycled Pop Tarts and eating happy pills and pretending to be interested in sports and manufactured news items. But, in the end, they fix him and he\'s happy again. Or something.\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 144 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Aug 12, 2007\n \n \n \n John Wiswell\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was ok\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n Recommends it for:\n \n \n Classics readers, political readers concerned with overreaches\n \n\n\n \n \n \n 1984\n \n is not a particularly good novel, but it is a very good essay. On the novel front, the characters are bland and you only care about them because of the awful things they live through. As a novel all the political exposition is heavyhanded, and the message completely overrides any sense of storytelling. As an essay, the points it makes can be earthshaking. It seems everyone who has so much as gotten a parking ticket thinks he lives in a 1984-dystopia. Every administration that reaches for po\n \n \n \n 1984\n \n is not a particularly good novel, but it is a very good essay. On the novel front, the characters are bland and you only care about them because of the awful things they live through. As a novel all the political exposition is heavyhanded, and the message completely overrides any sense of storytelling. As an essay, the points it makes can be earthshaking. It seems everyone who has so much as gotten a parking ticket thinks he lives in a 1984-dystopia. Every administration that reaches for power, injures civil liberties or collaborates too much with media is accused of playing Big Brother. These are the successes of\n \n 1984\n \n \'s paranoia, far outliving its original intent as a battery against where Communism was going (Orwell was a severely disappointed Marxist), and while people who compare their leaders to Big Brother are usually overreaching themselves and speak far away from Orwell\'s intent and vision, it is a useful catchcloth for dissent. Like so many immortalized books with a social vision,\n \n 1984\n \n \'s actual substance is so thin that its ideologies and fear-mongering aspects can be stretched and skewed to suit the readers. If you\'d like a better sense of the real world and Orwell\'s intents, rather than third-hand interpretations of his fiction, then his\n \n Homage to Catalonia\n \n is highly recommended.\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 147 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Feb 04, 2013\n \n \n \n Mohammed Arabey\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n \n \n It\'s written 1948? Clearly History has its twisted ways to repeat itself..\n\n
\n A Note that MUST be written in the cover of every edition..\n
\n \n
\n لم اتوقع أن هذا التحذير\n \n "إن هذه الرواية تحذير وليست بدليل"\n \n بهذه الواقعية، مازالت الحكومات العربية تراقب الجميع لحماية أمن الحكام..بينما مازال أمن الأفراد هزيلا..منعدما\n
\n \n \n
\n هي الرواية التي كتبت في 1948 بعبقرية، أرسي بها جورج أورويل قواعد روايات الديستوبيا بحق\n
\n وإن كانت مستوحاه من واقع محيط به ولكن التاريخ دائما يجد وسيلة ليتكرر ويزيد وينتشر ويتوغل\n
\n هي رواية مازالت صداها في\n \n \n \n It\'s written 1948? Clearly History has its twisted ways to repeat itself..\n
\n A Note that MUST be written in the cover of every edition..\n
\n \n
\n لم اتوقع أن هذا التحذير\n \n "إن هذه الرواية تحذير وليست بدليل"\n \n بهذه الواقعية، مازالت الحكومات العربية تراقب الجميع لحماية أمن الحكام..بينما مازال أمن الأفراد هزيلا..منعدما\n
\n \n \n
\n هي الرواية التي كتبت في 1948 بعبقرية، أرسي بها جورج أورويل قواعد روايات الديستوبيا بحق\n
\n وإن كانت مستوحاه من واقع محيط به ولكن التاريخ دائما يجد وسيلة ليتكرر ويزيد وينتشر ويتوغل\n
\n هي رواية مازالت صداها في روايات شبابية تصدر حتي الأن متأثرة بها..بل وقد تكون اكثر امتاعا منها\n
\n
\n *تحذير هام قبل البدء*\n
\n كاتب الريفيو متأثرا ويعاني أعراض "ازدواجية التفكير" بشكل خطير\n
\n فأذا لم تقرأ الرواية بعد فستستشعر ان كاتب الريفيو "مجنونا"، أما اذا قد قرأتها فستتيقن انه حتما يعاني من الجنون\n
\n
\n =======*****=======\n \n
\n عشقت هذه الروايه لدرجه الكراهيه\n
\n احببت جمال قبح العامه، وكرهت الحريه بشده..اقتنعت باننا يجب ان نخطئ وارتعبت جدا من الصواب\n
\n
\n وقد كرهت بشده الاجزاء السياسيه و ضجرت من تلك المقاله السياسيه الطويله "في الجزء الثاني" والتي عزمت علي ان اقرأها قراءه سريعه ..ولكن قرأت مايقرب من 40 صفحه في ساعه ونصف!! لأني شعرت انها فعلا يجب ان تقرأ بتمعن, فهي من اهم المقالات السياسية الواقعية\n
\n
\n كرهت تلك المشاهد الجنسيه البسيطه ولعلي استشطت غضبا اذا لم تحدث\n
\n وكم كرهت تلك النهايه التي شعرت انها قُدمت كنهاية سعيده..واكرهها اكثر كلما اشعر انها فعلا ليست سعيده\n
\n \n لقد عشقت تلك الروايه لاني شعرت بالملل المثير طوال احداثها\n
\n لم اشعر انها كلاسيكيه,رايتها معاصره واحداثها واقعية وتدور في الوقت الحالي , ومع ذلك شعرت بملل الكلاسيكيات بها\n
\n روايه ينعدم فيها العواطف ولكني تأثرت لدرجه الدمع في احد مشاهدها\n
\n روايه عشقت فيها اشمئزازي الرهيب منها, واحداثها وشخصياتها\n
\n روايه كنت اسابق الزمن كي انهي عذابي معها..وافكر في نفس الوقت متي سأقرأها مره ثانيه..قريبا\n
\n
\n =======*****=======\n
\n الاحداث\n
\n ------\n \n
\n اذا كنت من هواة قراءة الروايات الحديثة -مثلي- واعجبتك تلك الروايات المصنفه كديستوبيا - حيث يعم المدينه او الدوله او العالم ككل الظلم و القهر والفساد والاستبداد, الدمار والتجارب اللاانسانيه - تلك الروايات مثل\n
\n \n The Hunger Games\n \n و\n \n The Maze Runner\n \n و\n \n Divergent\n \n
\n \n او تجربه الرائع احمد خالد توفيق المصريه يوتوبيا\n \n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n فعليك بالبدء في تلك الروايه الكلاسيكيه للروائي العبقري "جورج اورويل" 1984\n
\n -فهي مدخل رائع لمثل ذلك النوع من الروايات, ولن تشعر أبدا انها كلاسيكية او قديمة, حتي وان كانت ترجع ل1948...قبل عنوان الرواية بأربعون عاما\n
\n
\n يجب التنويه انه اذا كنت قراءتها واعجبتك بالفعل فعليك بقراءه تلك الروايات الحديثه ايضا- ..بالأخص العاب المجاعات\n
\n \n
\n عقب الحرب العالميه الثانيه وفي وقت صراعات النازيه والشيوعيه ,فتره الاربعينات من القرن الماضي ينقلك المؤلف الي لندن في الديستوبيا التي يتنبأ بها بعد اقل من 40 عاما\n
\n ففي عام 1984 ستجد ان العالم بعد صراعاته الدمويه النوويه صار مقسما الي 3 قوي رئيسيه تتحكم في العالم بكل ما تحمله كلمه "تحكم" من معني\n
\n فتتحكم في مسكنك ومأكلك ومشربك,تتحكم في اسلوب حياتك,تتحكم في أراءك,توجهاتك\n
\n تتحكم في افكارك,مشاعرك,عواطفك..فتذكر ان الاخ الكبير يراقبك..دائما وابدا\n
\n
\n هل العالم كله هكذا؟ كيف لك ان تعرف ماذا يحدث في باقي العالم..اصمت واستمع للاخ الكبير فحسب..لا يوجد لك سبيل تواصل مع العالم الخارجي..فكلهم عدو لبلدك\n
\n انت منعزل تماما عن العالم..لايصلك من اخباره الا ما يقوله لك الأخ الكبير - هل يبدو ذلك مألوفا لك؟؟\n
\n \n
\n ستقابل مفاجأت واحداث مثيره, ثوره داخليه بعقلك,عقل وينستون البطل الذي تتعايش معه..كراهيه التمرد والشغف الشديد به\n
\n نبذ الحريه التي هي العبوديه..نبذ السلام الذي هو الحرب\n
\n \n
\n بالنسبه لي ما يعيب الاحداث شيئا ما هو الجزء المطول من "كتاب حكم الاقليه" والذي ذكرني كثيرا بجو كتب الفلسفه السياسيه كتلك التي يقدمها "يوسف زيدان" وغيره من مدعي الحنكة السياسية...ولكن يقدمها جورج اورويل هنا بطريقه محايده, مفهومة ومتميزة وبالرغم من الملل الذي اعتراني في الجزء الثاني ربما اغلبه بسبب هذا الجزء والذي بالرغم من انك قد قرأت ملخصه في الجزء الاول من الاحداث الا انك ستجد انه من الصعب ان تتركه دون قراءه\n
\n
\n ويحسب بحق للمؤلف "تعمقه الشديد"في احداث روايته ورسمها فعلا كانها عن عالم حقيقي.. "ذكرني بعبقريه اخري معاصره هي جي كي رولينج عندما تسهب في عرض مقالات من جرائد عالمها الساحر او عرض صفحات عده لاحد كتب ذلك العالم الخيالي الذي ابتكرته" وهذا ان دل علي شئ فانما يدل عن انك امام روايه ثريه لم يبخل المؤلف بها بشئ ليجعل من الخيال واقعيه فهو ايضا مزج تاريخ اوقيانيا بتاريخ تلك الاحداث العالميه الحقيقيه والمعاصره -وقت صدور الروايه - من نازيه و شيوعيه\n
\n \n
\n راعني ايضا ملاحظه وجدتها علي الويكابيديا هو ان "تبخير الانسان" واعتباره لم يكن\n
\n Unperson\n
\n كان امرا حقيقيا واتبعه بتعديل الصور وذلك في الاتحاد السوفييتي في الثلاثينات في صوره لستالين مع نيكولاي يزوف رئيس الشرطه السريه والتي تم تعديلها بعد اعدام الاخير لينسب الفضل لستالين وحده في حمله التطهير الشيوعيه وليكون وحده صاحب الفضل في بناء الاتحاد السوفييتي..اي ان الامر له اصول حقيقيه\n
\n \n \n
\n وأه من مظهر ستالين نفسه :)\n
\n \n \n
\n \n \n
\n وكما قلت في بدايه الريفيو ان ازدواجيه التفكير قادتني الي الجنون في هذا الريفيو\n \n
\n فاني من اعجابي الشديد بالروايه كنت اتمني ان لا تنتشر, ولا يتم طبعها ولا قراءتها علي نطاق واسع...فكم من اخ كبير ظهر بعدها ونفذ قليلا او كثيرا من سياسته...سواء كان علي حق وصواب في جزء من سياسته او علي خطأ\n
\n كم منا وصل الامر معه لعشق الاخ الكبير وحبه وتوقف عقله وذهنه وكأن هذا الاخ الكبير الذي نصبه لنفسه لا يخطئ؟\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n وايضا من اعجابي الشديد بالروايه اتمني ان تنتشر ويتم طبعها كثيرا و تقرأ علي نطاق واسع\n
\n فكم منا يجب ان يفيق ويدرك ان عليه ان يعمل بعقله ويفكر كثيرا في حريه فكره وعقله...يفكر لصالحه ولصالح المجتمع ويتخلص من سلطه الاخ الكبير عندما يراه خاطئا كاذبا او منافقا\n
\n \n \n الصور مجرد صور..لاتعبر عن راي شخصي فمابين تلك الصور ناس احترم سياستهم ولكني لا اراهم دائما علي حق ..فهم بشر اولا واخيرا بعضهم اصابوا ويصيبون قليلا و اخطئوا و يخطئون كثيرا و بعضهم العكس\n \n \n
\n
\n تناقض؟ هذا هو مايسمي بازدواجيه الفكر التي ستجدها في تلك الروايه الرائعه بحق\n
\n اقرأها لتتعرف كيف تحكم عقلك في مايعرض عليك من تاريخ..لتحاول التفرقه بين الزيف وبين الحق\n
\n لعلنا نستطيع القضاء علي من يسيطر علينا باسم الاخ الكبير..او من يدعي انه جولدشتاين عصره..اقرأها فانها بحق\n
\n روايه مرهقه للعقل\n
\n
\n =======*****=======\n
\n الشخصيات\n
\n -------\n \n
\n \n وينستون سميث\n \n
\n هو من ستتوحد معه خلال احداث الروايه\n
\n وهو الاختيار المناسب ,فهو الطبقه المتوسطه-ماتحت النخبة-..فهو يتوافر له الطعام والشراب والمسكن...ليس ادميا او يتناسب مع كونه احد اعضاء الحزب الخارجي وانما علي الاقل ادميا بما فيه الكفايه مقارنه بعامه الشعب ,اللاشئ , هؤلاء الذين يمثلون 85% من السكان,وهو في وضع أأمن منهم بعيدا عن اماكنهم المعرضه للقصف باستمرار\n
\n
\n ولكنه ليس افضل حالا منهم\n
\n فقيود حريته اعظم بكثير فهو -عكس عامه الشعب-مراقب 24/7حتي في احلامه واغوار عقله الباطن فيجب ان يكون منضبطا كالمسطره..تاركا افكارك ومشاعرك وعواطفك وتوجهاتك في يد "الاخ الكبير"..في يد حزبك الداخلي والذي يمثل 2% من السكان..اسيادك\n
\n
\n ذلك الحزب الداخلي الذي لا تعرف كيف يعيش..هل هو مثلك في تلك المعيشه..معيشه الكفاف او ما دونه؟ بالتاكيد لا, هم ليسوا كعامه الشعب الذين صاروا تحت مستوي الفقر..بل تحت مستوي الحياه نفسها, فلا يلقوا الكفاف..وحياتهم مهدده من وقت لاخر جراء عمليات القصف الحربيه التي لا احد يعرف كنهها بالتحديد\n
\n
\n \n
\n برع المؤلف في رسم شخصيته بطريقه ممتازه,تحولاته ودوافعه وافكاره بل ورسم ذكرياته باتقان وربط بينها وبين الاحداث بطريقه..عبقريه جورج اورويل فعلا ايقنتها برسمه لشخصيته\n
\n \n (view spoiler)\n \n \n [ادمعت بحق كما قلت في بدايه الريفيو في تلك الذكري التي تذكرها قبل لحظات النهايه عندما كان يلعب السلم والثعبان مع امه\n
\n تبا ها انا ارفض الكتابه عن تلك اللحظه لاني شعرت بالقشعريره الان مره اخري\n
\n
\n بالطبع وغضبت جدا لتلك النهايه السعيده..انها ليست تلك التي تمناها وينستون وانا معاه..ومع ذلك فاني متقبل تماما ان يلقي مصيره..سعيدا\n
\n
\n الم اقل لك؟ انها ازدواجيه التفكير تبا لها تلك اللعينه\n
\n \n (hide spoiler)\n \n ]\n \n \n
\n \n
\n \n جوليا\n \n
\n جوليا جوليا جوليا..اه من جوليا..لازدواجيه الفكر ظللت اعشقها واعشق فكرها واعشق ايضا فكره تحطيم راسها في اغلب الوقت\n
\n هي زميله وينستون في وزاره الحقيقه في الحزب الخارجي..زميلته الغامضه المريبه المتزمته لدرجة انك ستشعر انها روح الحزب نفسه..ولكنك ستكتشف عنها اشياء لم تخطر علي بال\n
\n \n
\n
\n \n اوبراين\n \n
\n عضو الحزب الداخلي الموقر..واحد من الساده ..ال2% من الشعب والذي من خلاله ستعرف مميزات هذه النخبه\n
\n رجل وقور..مهيب..محترم..ستشعر كم يتفهمك بمجرد نظرته\n
\n وكم من المفاجأت التي يطويها في طياتها\n
\n \n
\n فستفاجأ انه مثلك ومعك في الفكر..ولعلك ستفاجأ بحق عندما تجد انه بالفعل روح متمردة تغلغلت الي هذا الحد بالحزب\n
\n \n
\n روايه لن تشعر معها بالوقت..روايه ستقلب تفكيرك\n
\n
\n وكما يقول المترجم "الرائع بحق" انور الشامي لهذه النسخه العربيه\n
\n\n إنها رواية تقرأ، ثم تقرأ من جديد\n\n
\n وبالفعل..الي قراءه اخري ربما للنسخه الانجليزيه المره القادمه ان شاء الله\n
\n \n
\n محمد العربي\n
\n من 27 مايو 2013\n
\n الي 30 مايو 2013\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 97 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Apr 19, 2012\n \n \n \n Huda Yahya\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n حدثني عن القهر\n\n
\n عن الاستعباد\n
\n عن الذل\n
\n ثم حدثني بأدق التفاصيل\n
\n عن مراحل تقويض الكائن الانساني\n
\n
\n حدثني كثيرا وطويلا كي أعي هذا الدمار\n
\n كي أتشربه\n
\n كي أدميه في لحمي وأعصابي نصلا حادا طويلا\n
\n كي أنزف روحي بكاء\n
\n كي أتعلم شيئا نافعا قبل أن أغادر هذا العالم البائس\n
\n
\n حدثني يا أورويل فما أشهى وجع حديثك\n
\n وما أشهى ألم المعرفة النازف\n
\n
\n \n الحرب هي السلام\n \n
\n
\n ما المفترض علي فعله\n
\n الكتابة عن نفسي أم عن وطني أم عن وينستون\n
\n بمن أبدأ\n
\n
\n ولكن مهلا\n
\n لما التفرقة..؟\n
\n كلنا واحد\n
\n أنا.. وينستون..جوليا..أنت..\n
\n بقعة الأرض التي تنتمي إليها روحك\n
\n وتدعوها وطن\n
\n
\n \n الحريّة هي العبود\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n حدثني عن القهر\n
\n عن الاستعباد\n
\n عن الذل\n
\n ثم حدثني بأدق التفاصيل \u200f\n
\n عن مراحل تقويض الكائن الانساني\u200f\n
\n
\n حدثني كثيرا وطويلا كي أعي هذا الدمار\n
\n كي أتشربه\n
\n كي أدميه في لحمي وأعصابي نصلا حادا طويلا\n
\n كي أنزف روحي بكاء\n
\n كي أتعلم شيئا نافعا قبل أن أغادر هذا العالم البائس\n
\n
\n حدثني يا أورويل فما أشهى وجع حديثك\n
\n وما أشهى ألم المعرفة النازف\n
\n
\n \u200f\n \n الحرب هي السلام\n \n
\n
\n ما المفترض علي فعله\n
\n الكتابة عن نفسي أم عن وطني أم عن وينستون\n
\n بمن أبدأ\n
\n
\n ولكن مهلا\n
\n لما التفرقة..؟\n
\n كلنا واحد\n
\n أنا.. وينستون..جوليا..أنت..\u200f\n
\n بقعة الأرض التي تنتمي إليها روحك\n
\n وتدعوها وطن\n
\n
\n \n الحريّة هي العبودية\n \n
\n
\n كلنا كتلة معجونة بألف نوع من النزف\n
\n كلنا ذرات اجتمعت وتشكلت آدميين ونباتات وصخور\n
\n
\n \n الجهل هو القّوة\n \n
\n
\n كلنا غبار نجوم أراد له حظه السيئ أن يتشكل ليكون العائلة \u200fالإنسانية على كوكب ملعون أسميناه الأرض\n
\n
\n \u200f\n \n الأخ الكبير يراقبك\n \n
\n
\n من نحن يا أورويل..؟\n
\n من نحن حتى نفعل ذلك بأنفسنا\n
\n من نحن حتى نهزم بعضنا البعض بهذه الطريقة\n
\n أي لعنة حلت بنا فأصبحنا بشرا يأكل بعضه بعضا بأبشع \u200fالصور..؟\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n\n الولاء يعني إنعدام التفكير .. بل إنعدام الحاجة للتفكير\n\n
\n الولاء هو عدم الوعي\n
\n ____________\n \n \n
\n
\n يقول أورويل أن الكتاب الأفضل\n
\n هو ما يخبرك بما تعرفه بالفعل\n
\n ولكننا باختلاف خبراتنا لم نكن نعرف أننا يمكن لنا كبشر أن \u200fننحط لهذه الدرجة\n
\n أن ننهزم لهذه الدرجة\n
\n كان هناك أمل أهوج يناطح بداخل كل واحد فينا بدرجة متفاوتة\n
\n يحاول الاحتفاظ بصورته الآدمية التي تمزقت أشلاء مرة تلو \u200fالمرة\n
\n بعد كل قراءة للتاريخ\n
\n أو معايشة لأحداث ثورة\n
\n
\n ولكنه كان كذلك حقا بالنسبة لي\n
\n لقد أخبرني بما كنت أعرفه بالفعل\n
\n لكنني أنكر بعضه بعناد\n
\n أهوّن على نفسي بابتداعات دماغية \u200f\n
\n بهلوسات أمل عن انتصار العدل ذات يوم\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n\n من وجهة نظر الطبقة الدنيا \u200f\n\n
\n فإن أي تغيير تاريخي لا يعدو أن يكون مجرد تغيير في أسماء \u200f\u200fسادتها\n
\n ــــــــــــــــ\n \n \n
\n من منا نظر إلى ما حوله بنفس الطريقة بعد قراءة كتاب \u200fكهذا..؟\n
\n من منا لم تتغير رؤيته لأشياء كثيرة كثيرة كان عنها غافل\n
\n أو متغافل\n
\n إن لم يكن هذا الكتاب ضربة الفأس التي تحدث عنها كافكا\n
\n والتي تهزك من الأعماق\n
\n فماذا يكون إذا..؟\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n\n \u200fإن ألد أعدائك هو جهازك العصبي\n\n
\n ــــــــــــ\n \n
\n إنها الديستوبيا الأكثر سوادا في تاريخ الأدب\n
\n فيها يعيش الكائن الحي في خوف دائم\n
\n خوف من شرطة الفكر\n
\n من شاشات الرصد\n
\n من التفوه بكلمة قد تدمر حياته بأكملها\n
\n من تعبير وجه قد ينفلت منه دون قصد فيسحق بلا رحمة\n
\n من خطرٍ محتمل الوقوع\n
\n من عدو مجهول قد ينقض عليك في أي لحظة\n
\n من عيون الأخ الكبير\n
\n الإله..المخلص..المحبوب غصبا عن الكل.. وبرضا الكل\n
\n تلك العيون التي لم تترك شيئا لم تتواجد عليه\u200f\n
\n أغلفة الكتب ..الطوابع.. \u200fالأعلام .. أغلفة الحلوى..لعملات \u200f\n
\n إنه يلاحقك أينما تكون\n
\n وفي كل وقت\n
\n
\n الأخ الأكبر \u200f\n
\n الطاغية المعبود في كل زمان ومكان\n
\n هذا الذي قد يكون مستوحى من ستالين\n
\n ولكنه يجثم على أنفاس الخلائق منذ بدأ تاريخ الأرض\u200f\n
\n
\n وأوقيانيا هي الدولة\u200f التي اخترعها أورويل\n
\n ليبني على أرضها \u200fهذه الديستوبيا المريعة\n
\n
\n فيها شاشات الرصد تترصد كل \u200fتحركاتك\n
\n فيها يحافظ الجميع على دقيقتي الكراهية\n
\n للتنفيس عن غضبهم من المعارض غولدشتاين\n
\n أو بمعنى آخر الشيطان الأعظم كما يصور له سادته\n
\n
\n إنه مجتمع مصادر الحقوق منتهك الحريات \u200f\n
\n \u200fمحروم حتى من مجرد التفكير\n
\n مجتمع يقضي عمره كله تحت الرقابة\n
\n التي تحصي عليه أنفاسه \u200f وتحركاته \u200f\n
\n مجتمع يعرف مصيره منذ أن يولد\n
\n يعرف أن الطاغية الأعظم قد حدد له كل شيء سلفا\n
\n طعامه.. شرابه .. نوع قهوته -بن النصر \u200f\n
\n عدد \u200fشفرات الحلاقة\n
\n
\n \u200fفيه وزارة الحقيقة \u200f تزور الحقيقة وتختلق الأكاذيب \u200f\n
\n وزارة \u200fالسلام تختص بشؤون الحرب والسلاح\n
\n وزارة الوفرة تجوع المواطنين\n
\n \u200f ووارة الحب تعذب الخلائق وتناهض الجنس \u200f\n
\n
\n أهي تسميات ساخرة حقا..؟\n
\n أوزارة الحب تختلف عن الأمن الوطني أو أمن الدولة عندنا..؟\n
\n في الرواية تبررها فلسفة الحزب-الدولة للتفكير المزدوج\n
\n
\n أما عندنا فما هو التبرير يا ترى\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n\n \u200eإن جريمة الفكر لا تفضي إلى الموت إنها الموت نفسه\u200e\n\n
\n ـــــــــــــ\n
\n
\n يعتمد الحزب الميمون على ما أسماه بالتفكير الازدواجي\n
\n إنه يعني ببساطة أن تعي \u200fالحقيقة كاملة \u200f\n
\n ومع ذلك تصدق عكسها وبنفس القناعة\n
\n \u200f أن \u200fتؤمن برأيين متناقضين \u200f\n
\n \u200f" أن تجهض المنطق بالمنطق\u200f\n
\n \u200f أن ترفض الالتزام \u200fبالأخلاق فيما أنت واحدٌ من الداعين إليها\n
\n \u200f أن تعتقد أن \u200fالديمقراطية ضربٌ من المستحيل في حين أن \u200fالحزب وصيّ عليه\n
\n \u200fأن تنسى كل ما يتعين عليك نسيانه ثم تستحضره في الذاكرة \u200fحينما \u200fتمس الحاجة إليه\n
\n \u200f ثم تنساه مرة ثانية فورًا.."\u200f\n
\n
\n إنه ليس تجردا من الإنسانية فحسب\u200f\n
\n إنه إعادة تصنيع للمخ البشري\n
\n بعد محو كل ما بداخله\n
\n إنهم لا يكتفون بأن تخاف\n
\n بأن تصير كتلة ممزقة اللحم والأعصاب تستعطفهم الموت حتى \u200fينتهي عذابك\n
\n إنهم يحيلونك آخر\n
\n ليصير عقلك ألة\n
\n مجرد آلة صماء تنفذ الأوامر\u200f\n
\n وهذا الآخر أو الآلة يصير مقتنعا تمام الاقتناع بكل استبداد كان \u200fيناضل لأجل زواله\u200f\n
\n
\n إنهم يمسخونك ..\u200f\n
\n وهذا أشنع ما في الأمر\n
\n هذا أشنع ما في الأمر\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n\n وأدرك أيضاً أن هذا هو ما يعتري الإنسان في كل المواقف \u200f\u200fالبطولية والمأساوية\n\n
\n ففي ميدان القتال أو في غرفة التعذيب أو على متن سفينة \u200fتغرق\n
\n تغدو القضايا التي تحارب من أجلها طيّ النسيان دائما\n
\n ذلك لأن جسدك يظل يتضخم حتى يملأ عليك العالم فلا ترى \u200fسواه\n
\n ــــــــــــــــ\n
\n
\n يعمل وينستون سميث في وزارة \u200fالحقيقة\n
\n يشاهد ويشارك يوميا في تزوير التاريخ \u200f\n
\n كل السجلات تم إتلافها \u200f\n
\n وكل كتاب أعيدت كتابته وكل \u200fصورة أعيد رسمها\n
\n واسم كل تمثال وشارع وبناية جرى استبداله\n
\n وكل تاريخ جرى تحريفه \u200f\n
\n
\n \u200f“إننا نقوم بتدمير الكلمات –عشرات بل مئات الكلمات\n
\n "كل يوم \u200f\u200fيجري تدميرها.. إننا نسلخ اللغة حتى العظام\n
\n
\n ولكن وينستون ارتكب الجريمة العظمى\n
\n فقد بدأ في الشك\u200f\n
\n والتفكير في هذا الهراء الذي يعيش بداخله\n
\n لقد تمرد في عقله ثم على أرض الواقع\n
\n يقيم \u200fعلاقةً مع جوليا المتمردة كذلك\u200f\n
\n ينخرط معها في تنظيم للتآمر على الحزب \u200f\n
\n أو هكذا خيل لهما\n
\n
\n وهكذا يلقى تحت رحمة من لا يرحم\n
\n
\n \u200f "إننا \u200fسنسحقك إلى درجة لا يمكنك بعدها أن تعود بحياتك إلى \u200fسيرتها \u200fالأولى وستحدث لك أشياء لن يمكنك أن تبرأ من \u200fآثارها حتى لو \u200fعشت ألف عام وأبدا لن تقدر ثانيةً على الشعور \u200fبما يشعر به \u200fالأحياء\n
\n إن كل شيء سيموت داخلك ولن تعود \u200fقادرا على الحب أو \u200fالصداقة أو الاستمتاع بالحياة أو الضحك أو \u200fحب الاستطلاع أو \u200fالشجاعة أو الاستقامة\n
\n "ستكون أجوف لأننا \u200fسنعصرك حتى تصبح \u200fخواء من كل شيء ثم نملأك بذواتنا\n
\n
\n والتعذيب الرهيب الذي يتعرض له وينستون هو تعذيب ممنهج \u200f\n
\n "نحن لا نحطم أعداءنا فحسب\n
\n \u200fوإنما نغير ما في أنفسهم"\n
\n
\n لا بطش من أجل الانتقام\n
\n أو تلقين الخارجين عن قوانين الحزب \u200fدرسا قاسيا\n
\n
\n إنهم لا يقبلون بالطاعة السلبية أو حتى بالخضوع\u200f بمعناه المعروف\n
\n فعندما يخضع السجين في النهاية يجب أن يكون ذلك نابعًا من \u200fإرادته الحرة\u200f\n
\n لا يكفي أن \u200f\u200fتقول أن 2 \u200f\u200f+ 2 =5\u200f\n
\n يجب أن تؤمن بها \u200f\n
\n
\n "إننا نبدد فكره ونجعله \u200fواحدًا منا قبل أن نقتله\n
\n إننا نجري للدماغ غسيلا شاملاً قبل أن \u200fنعصف به\n
\n نحن نختلف عن طغاة الماضي الذين يقولون: \u200f\n
\n يجب \u200fأن لا تفعل ذلك\n
\n \u200f وعن الاستبداديين الذين يقولون: \u200f\n
\n يجب أن تفعل \u200fذلك\n
\n "نحن نقول: كن..\u200f\n
\n
\n إنهم لا يسمحون لأحد بأن يخرج \u200fمن سجنهم شهيدا\u200f\n
\n
\n إنهم لن يسمعوا عنك أبدًا لأنّك ستُزال تمامًا من سجل \u200fالتاريخ"\n
\n سنحيلك إلى غاز ثم نطلقك في الهواء. سنجعلك نسيًا \u200fمنسيًّا. \u200fولن يبقى منك شيء لا اسمًا في سجل ولا أثرًا في ذاكرةٍ \u200fحيّة\n
\n \u200fستمحى كل علاقةٍ لك بالماضي كما بالمستقبل وستصبح \u200fوكأنك \u200fلم تكن "\u200f\n
\n
\n \n \u200f-كم اصبعا تري يا ونستون \u200f..؟\n
\n \u200f-أربعا.. خمسا \u200f\n
\n الرقم الذي تريده ..كل ما أرجوه أن توقف \u200fالألم\u200f...\u200f\n \n
\n
\n تحت وطأة التعذيب يعترف وينستون "بجرائم" لم يرتكبها أصلا\n
\n
\n \u200fوغدا همه الوحيد أن يكتشف ما يريدون أن يعترف به" \u200f\n
\n حتى يبادر إلي الاعتراف قبل أن يلجأ المحققون لحمله علي \u200fذلك\u200f"\n
\n
\n اغتيال \u200fعدد من أعضاء الحزب البارزين \u200f\n
\n وتوزيع \u200fمنشورات تحرض علي الفتنة \u200f\n
\n واختلاس أموال عامة وبيع أسرار \u200fعسكرية والاشتراك في \u200fعمليات التخريب \u200f\n
\n وبأنه كان \u200fعميلا مأجورا لحكومة استاسيا \u200f\n
\n وبأنه كان مؤمنا بالله ومعجبا \u200fبالرأسمالية \u200f\n
\n وبأنه انزلق الي الشذوذ الجنسي \u200f\n
\n وأنه قتل \u200fزوجته بالرغم من أنه يعرف مثلما يعرف المحققون \u200fأن زوجته لا \u200fتزال علي قيد الحياة\n
\n ......\n
\n
\n يمر وينستون بمراحل عدة حتى يصل لمرحلة القبول\n
\n
\n لقد شعر في غحدى المراحل بأن بقاءه إنسانا\n
\n هو أمر يستحق \u200fالتضحية من أجله \u200f\n
\n حتى لو لم يؤد ذلك إلى نتيجة فإنه يكون قد \u200fألحق بهم الهزيمة\u200f\n
\n
\n وقد مرت عليه أوقات كانت رؤيته للحرية\n
\n هي أن يموت وهو يكرههم\u200f\n
\n
\n ولكن ذلك كما نعلم.. لم يدم طويلا\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n\n كان الذي استهواه من ذلك كله هو تلك الحركة\n\n
\n التي نزعت بها \u200f\u200fثيابها وطوحت بها أرضا\n
\n فبرشاقتها وعدم مبالاتها بدا كأنها \u200f\u200fتقوض \u200fثقافة كاملة\n
\n وتنقض نظاما فكريا بكليته، كما لو لن الأخ \u200f\u200fالكبير والحزب وشرطة الفكر يمكن أن تذهب أدراج الرياح \u200fبحركة \u200fبارعة \u200fكحركة ذراعها \u200f \u200f\n
\n ــــــــــ\n
\n إنه هذا المزج العجيب الذي تمكن منه أورويل تمكن أستاذ\n
\n فبرغم كون الرواية تحمل عمقا وقوة تجعلها بلا جدال من \u200fالطراز \u200fالرفيع\n
\n إلا أنها تصل لجميع نوعيات القراء\u200f\n
\n ولا تحتاج فئة معينة كي تفهمها\n
\n هي موجهة للجميع\n
\n واستطاعت أن تصل إلى قلوب الجميع\n
\n لقد صنع المعادلة الصعبة بالفعل\u200f\n
\n فلا تدع براعتها السياسية تنسيك أنها رواية أدبية من أعلى \u200fطراز\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n
\n \n السلطة عند الحزب الحاكم\n \n \u200f\n
\n
\n اقرأ جيدا ما يقوله أورويل على لسان أوبراين\n
\n
\n إن الحزب يسعى إلى بلوغ السلطة لذاتها تلك المطلقة. \u200fالسلطة \u200fغاية وليست وسيلة. لا نسعى وراء الثروة ولا الرفاهية \u200fولا \u200fالعمر المديد ولا السعادة. إننا ندرك أنه ما من أحد يمسك بزمام \u200f\u200fالسلطة وهو ينتوي التخلي عنها. فالمرء لا يقيم حكما \u200fاستبداديا \u200fلحماية الثورة وإنما يشعل الثورة لاقامة حكم \u200fاستبدادي. إن الهدف \u200fمن الاضطهاد هو الاضطهاد. والهدف \u200fمن التعذيب هو التعذيب \u200fوغاية السلطة هي السلطة. والسلطة \u200fهي سلطان على البشر، على \u200fأجسامهم وعلى عقولهم قبل كل \u200fشيء. أما أن يكون لك سلطان \u200fعلى المادة فليس بالأمر الهام إذ \u200fنحن نسيطر على المادة سيطرة \u200fمطلقة.\u200f\n
\n
\n ::::::::::::::::::::\n
\n
\n \n النهــــاية\n \n
\n
\n وينستون يذبحنا بكلماته الأخيرة\n
\n أذكر أنني وقت القراءة الأولى ظللت أردد تلك الجملة \u200f\n
\n بلا وعي وبانذهال تام\n
\n \n (view spoiler)\n \n \n [\n
\n وهكذا انتصرت على نفسي \u200fوصرت أحبّ الأخ الكبير\n
\n وهكذا انتصرت على نفسي \u200fوصرت أحبّ الأخ الكبير\n
\n وهكذا انتصرت على نفسي \u200fوصرت أحبّ الأخ الكبير\n
\n وهكذا انتصرت على نفسي \u200fوصرت أحبّ الأخ الكبير\n
\n ...\n \n (hide spoiler)\n \n ]\n \n
\n
\n فاكتب معي الآن ضاحكا حتى ينخلع قلبك \u200f\n
\n
\n الحرب هي السلام\n
\n العبودية هي الحرية\n
\n الجهل هو القوة\n
\n 2+2=5\n
\n
\n وحاول معي أن تحل هذه الأحجية\n
\n :\n
\n :\n
\n\n لن يثوروا حتى يعوا\n\n
\n ولن يعوا إلا بعد أن يثوروا\n
\n
\n !\n
\n -------------\n
\n
\n هذه المراجعة أرهقتني\n
\n وعذبتني\n
\n وأضنت روحي تماما\n
\n أعتذر لطولها..كما أعتذر \u200f لكثرة الاقتباسات ولكثرة ثرثرتي\n
\n
\n إنني فقط أحاول محاولات طفولية\n
\n أحاول كتابة ما يليق بعظمة مثل هذه الرواية\n
\n
\n وأرجو أن أكون قد وفقت في أن أصف\n
\n ولو بعض مما اعتراني مع هذا العمل البديع\n
\n ..\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 28 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jun 03, 2011\n \n \n \n Obaydah Amer\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n \n \n هذه الرواية لا يجب أن تصنف أدبا ورواية وفنا وحسب ..\n\n
\n كلا .. هي أكبر من ذلك,\n
\n يجب أن تدرس كحالة مستعصية في علم الاجتماع وعلم السياسة .. !\n
\n
\n عندما كتب جورج أورويل في الـ1949 كان متشائما لدرجة بعيدة لما سيؤول له العالم بعد 1984\n
\n نعم، ربما لم يتحقق ما قاله أورويل تماما، لكنه قد حصل بصورة موازية وشبيهة في كثير من المجتمعات الشمولية\n
\n لنتحدث عن سوريا مثلا :\n
\n
\n الأخ الكبير : القائد الملهم والرئيس الشاب الدكتور بشار الأسد ..\n
\n أعضاء الحزب الداخلي: بعض المكونات الرئيسية للنظام\n
\n أعضاء الحزب الخارجي: حزب البعث\n
\n العامة: 19 مليون\n \n \n هذه الرواية لا يجب أن تصنف أدبا ورواية وفنا وحسب ..\n
\n كلا .. هي أكبر من ذلك,\n
\n يجب أن تدرس كحالة مستعصية في علم الاجتماع وعلم السياسة .. !\n
\n
\n عندما كتب جورج أورويل في الـ1949 كان متشائما لدرجة بعيدة لما سيؤول له العالم بعد 1984\n
\n نعم، ربما لم يتحقق ما قاله أورويل تماما، لكنه قد حصل بصورة موازية وشبيهة في كثير من المجتمعات الشمولية\n
\n لنتحدث عن سوريا مثلا :\n
\n
\n الأخ الكبير : القائد الملهم والرئيس الشاب الدكتور بشار الأسد ..\n
\n أعضاء الحزب الداخلي: بعض المكونات الرئيسية للنظام\n
\n أعضاء الحزب الخارجي: حزب البعث\n
\n العامة: 19 مليون ونصف المليون مواطن سوري\n
\n أوقيانوسيا: سوريا الأسد\n
\n الله هو السلطة: الله سوريا بشار وبس\n
\n التفكير المزدوج: "دولة ممانعة لم تطلق رصاصة واحدة على عدوها الذي وجدت لممانعته" مثلا\n
\n شاشات الرصد: الهواتف والتجسس على الإنترنت\n
\n اللغة الجديدة: الإصلاح، الممانعة، التقدم، القومية وغيرها\n
\n أوبراين: نموذج للمخبر السوري الذي تمنحه روحك وثقتك ليضربك ويهينك\n
\n غرفة 101: السجن الصحراوي\n
\n غرف وأقبية وزارة الحب: المقار الأمنية المنتشرة في كل مكان\n
\n حتى الجهاز ذا القرص موجود باسم بساط الريح\n
\n وغيرها ..\n
\n
\n المقصود أن بإمكانك إسقاط الرواية على أي مجتمع شمولي لترى منظورا مشابها لذاك العالم المظلم.\n
\n لكن النتيجة المختلفة ..\n
\n
\n هناك بعض الجمل التي يجب أن تحفظ حفظا، لا أن تسجل فقط :\n
\n \n الولاء يعني عدم التفكير، بل هو عدم الحاجة للتفكير. الولاء يعني عدم الوعي\n \n
\n وهذا ما نحفظه وندرسه في المدارس بنفس المصطلح، الولاء للأخ الكبير .. بغض النظر عن تصرفاته ونتائجها وأفكاره وما يقوم به، أي فعلا عدم الوعي ..\n
\n
\n \n إن كان هناك من أمل فهو في العامة\n \n
\n تماما .. فقط أعطهم بعض الوعي وسيصنعون المعجزات ..\n
\n أي :\n
\n \n لكي يثوروا يجب أن يعوا، ولكي يعوا يجب أن يثورووا\n \n
\n
\n أرجوك .. إن نسيت كل الرواية، فاخرج منها بهذه الثلاث كلمات فقط .. !\n
\n \n غاية السلطة هي السلطة\n \n
\n السلطة وحسب ..\n
\n ولا تصدقوا كل الخطابات الخالدة والوعود الاقتصادية والسياسية والعسكرية والتنموية ..\n
\n السلطة للسلطة، لا لخدمة أحد أو شعب أو إنسانية أو قيمة أو خلق أو أي شيء آخر ..\n
\n لذلك فالسلطة المطلقة دائما مفسدة مطلقة ..\n
\n
\n مقاطع كتاب غولدشتاين وإن كانت طوباوية إلى حد ما، لكنها صحيحة وأكاديمية . !\n
\n
\n الوضع الطبيعي يجب أن يسير كما تحدث عنه أورويل، ولو أن صاحب الحانوت - نسيت اسمه - وأوبراين ما كانا مخبرين لنجحت الثورة ..\n
\n وهذا ما حصل في مصر وتونس، وسيحصل في بقية المجتمعات الشمولية ..\n
\n بوعي العامة وثورتهم ثم وعيهم مرة أخرى ..\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 53 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Aug 28, 2008\n \n \n \n Stephen\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n all-time-favorites\n \n ,\n \n 6-star-books\n \n ,\n \n easton-press\n \n ,\n \n audiobook\n \n ,\n \n 1930-1953\n \n ,\n \n world-in-the-shitter\n \n ,\n \n science-fiction\n \n ,\n \n favorite-ideas\n \n ,\n \n literature\n \n ,\n \n classics\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n
\n I am a big fan of speculative fiction and in my literary travels I have encountered a myriad of dystopias, anti-utopias and places and societies that make one want to scream and.....\n \n \n \n
\n ...\n \n (with or without contemporaneous loss of bladder and other bodily functions)\n \n ....\n
\n
\n Simply put, George Orwell\'s 1984 is unquestionably the most memorable and\n \n MOST DISTURBING\n \n vision of a world gone\n\n mad\n\n utterly bat-shit psycho that I have ever experienced. Ever!!! Despite being published back in 1948, I have yet to f\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n I am a big fan of speculative fiction and in my literary travels I have encountered a myriad of dystopias, anti-utopias and places and societies that make one want to scream and.....\n \n \n \n
\n ...\n \n (with or without contemporaneous loss of bladder and other bodily functions)\n \n ....\n
\n
\n Simply put, George Orwell\'s 1984 is unquestionably the most memorable and\n \n MOST DISTURBING\n \n vision of a world gone\n\n mad\n\n utterly bat-shit psycho that I have ever experienced. Ever!!! Despite being published back in 1948, I have yet to find a more chilling, nightmarish locale than Orwell\'s iconic world of\n \n BIG BROTHER\n \n and\n \n INGSOC\n \n . The very mention of either of those terms invokes images of Nazis and Soviet gulags in my mind. Yet Orwell\'s creation is in many ways even more insidious than these real-world bogeymen.\n
\n
\n I first read this book when I was 12 years old in 7th grade as a...get this...class reading assignment. Looking back on it, I have NO IDEA why on Earth we were reading this book at that age but I do recall we spent quite a bit of time discussing it. I wish I could recall the substance of those discussions because I can only imagine the kind of PIERCING INSIGHT that a group of hormonally challenged pre-teens thought up in regards to this book. Needless to say, I think that this is a book that is best appreciated AFTER your first pimple.\n
\n
\n Anyway, I decided to re-read this book recently as an adult in the hopes that I would be able to gain a great appreciation for this classic. Well, the book did more than that.\n \n IT ABSOLUTELY FLOORED ME\n \n . From the very first sentence,\n \n "It was a bright, cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen"\n \n to the unforgettable final sentence (which I will not give away here), this story sucked me in, beat the living shit out of me and through me out the other side a hollow, wasted wreck. I know, it doesn\'t sound very cheery, but it is a life-changing experience.\n
\n
\n I have always thought that one of the best and most important qualities of science fiction is that it frees the author to take the controversial, politically charged issues and trends of the day and create a possible future based on exaggerations of such trends and in so doing present a compelling and critical argument for change. Well NO ONE has ever done a better job than better Orwell in showing the possible nightmare (and thus potential danger) of a society without basic civil liberties and a government with complete and unchallenged control.\n
\n
\n This book is bleak, dreary, frightening, upsetting and absolutely BRILLIANT and one of my "All Time Favorite" novels. HIGHEST POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION!! 6.0 stars.\n
\n
\n ...........\n \n REMEMBER, BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU\n \n .............\n
\n
\n \n \n \n
\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 43 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Feb 19, 2018\n \n \n \n Maria\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n favorites\n \n\n\n \n \n I\'m gonna ask myself a mandatory question and say nothing more.\n\n
\n
\n Why the fuck had I not read this book before?\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 18 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jan 06, 2011\n \n \n \n Lyndsey\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n about-dystopia-or-utopia\n \n ,\n \n i-recommend\n \n ,\n \n reviewed-2010\n \n ,\n \n reviewed-2011\n \n ,\n \n reviewed-5-stars\n \n ,\n \n favorites\n \n ,\n \n pov-primarily-male\n \n ,\n \n 3rd-person-limited\n \n ,\n \n experience\n \n ,\n \n my-top-dystopian-or-utopian\n \n\n\n \n \n \n YOU. ARE. THE. DEAD.\n \n Oh my God. I got the chills so many times toward the end of this book. It completely blew my mind. It managed to surpass my high expectations AND be nothing at all like I expected. Or in Newspeak "Double Plus Good."\n\n
\n
\n Let me preface this with an apology. If I sound stunningly inarticulate at times in this review, I can\'t help it. My mind is completely fried.\n
\n
\n \n This book is like the dystopian Lord of the Rings\n \n , with its richly developed culture and economics, not to mention a fully\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n YOU. ARE. THE. DEAD.\n \n Oh my God. I got the chills so many times toward the end of this book. It completely blew my mind. It managed to surpass my high expectations AND be nothing at all like I expected. Or in Newspeak "Double Plus Good."\n
\n
\n Let me preface this with an apology. If I sound stunningly inarticulate at times in this review, I can\'t help it. My mind is completely fried.\n
\n
\n \n This book is like the dystopian Lord of the Rings\n \n , with its richly developed culture and economics, not to mention a fully developed language called Newspeak, or rather more of the anti-language, whose purpose is to limit speech and understanding instead of to enhance and expand it. The world-building is so fully fleshed out and spine-tinglingly terrifying that it\'s almost as if George travelled to such a place, escaped from it, and then just wrote it all down.\n
\n
\n I read Fahrenheit 451 over ten years ago in my early teens. At the time, I remember really wanting to read 1984, although I never managed to get my hands on it. I\'m almost glad I didn\'t. Though I would not have admitted it at the time, it would have gone over my head. Or at the very least, I wouldn\'t have been able to appreciate it fully.\n
\n
\n From the start, the author manages to articulate so many of the things I have thought about but have never been able to find a way to put into words. Even in the first few chapters I found myself having to stop just to quietly consider the words of Mr Orwell.\n
\n
\n For instance, he talks about how\n \n the act of writing itself is a type of time travel\n \n . It is communicating with the future. I write these words now, but others may not discover them for hours, weeks, or even years. For me, it is one time. For you the reader, it is an entirely different one.\n
\n
\n Just the thought that reading and writing could one day be outlawed just shivers my timbers. I related to Winston so much in that way. I would have found a way to read or write.\n
\n
\n \n The politics and psychology of this novel run deep\n \n . The society in the book has no written laws, but many acts are punishable by death. The slogan of the Party (War is Peace...) is entirely convoluted. Individuality is frowned upon and could lead to being labeled a traitor to the Party.\n
\n
\n I also remember always wondering why the title was 1984. I was familiar with the concept of Big Brother and wondered why that wasn\'t the name of the book. In the story, they don\'t actually know what year it is because so much of the past has been erased by the Ministry of Truth. It could very easily have been 1981. I think that makes the title more powerful. Something as simple as the year or date is unknown to these people. They have to believe it is whatever day that they are told it is. They don\'t have the right to keep track. Knowledge is powerful. Knowledge is necessary. But according to Big Brother. Ignorance is strength.\n
\n
\n 1984 is written in past tense and has long paragraphs of exposition, recounting events, and explaining the society. These are usually things that distance me from a book and from the characters, but Orwell managed to keep me fully enthralled. He frequently talks in circles and ideas are often repeated but it is still intriguing, none the less. I must admit that I zoned out a bit while Winston was reading from The Book, but I was very fascinated by the culture.\n
\n
\n Sometimes it seems as though the only way to really experience a characters emotions is through first person. This is not the case with this book, as it is written in third person; yet, I never failed to be encompassed in Winston\'s feelings. George manages to ensure that the reader never feels disconnected from the events that are unfolding around them, with the exception of the beginning when Winston is just starting to become awakened. I developed a strong attachment to Winston and thrived on living inside his mind. I became a member of the Thought Police, hearing everything, feeling everything and last but not least, (what the Thought Police are not allowed to do) questioning everything.\n
\n
\n I wasn\'t expecting a love story in this book, but the relationship between Julia and Winston was truly profound. I enjoyed it even more than I would have expected and thought the moments between them were beautiful. I wasn\'t sure whether he was going to eventually betray Julia to the Party or not, but I certainly teared up often when it came to their relationship.\n
\n
\n George has an uncanny ability to get to the base of the human psyche, at times suggesting that we need to be at war for many different reasons, whether it\'s at war with ourselves or with others. That is one thing I have never understood: why humans feel the need to destroy and control each other.\n
\n
\n It seems that the main and recurring message in this book is about censorship and brainwashing. One, censorship, is limited and little exposure to ideas of the world; the other, brainwashing, is forced and too much exposure to a certain ideas. Both can be extremely dangerous.\n
\n
\n Inside the ministry of Truth, he demonstrates the dangers of censorship by showing how the Party has completely rewritten the past by forging and abolishing documents and physical evidence. We also spend quite a bit of time with Winston in the Ministry of Love, where the brainwashing takes place. Those who commit thoughtcrime are tortured until they grow to love and obey Big Brother and serve only the interests of the Party.\n
\n
\n A common theme occurred to me throughout the book, although it wasn\'t necessarily referenced consistently. The good of the many is more important than the good of the one. There are so many variables when it comes to this statement and for the most part it seems natural to say, "Of course, the many is more important than the one", but when inside Winston\'s head, all that I began to care about was his well-being and not if he was able to help disband or conquer the Party and Big Brother. I just wanted him to be at peace.\n
\n
\n Whether or not the good of all is more important than that of the one, I can\'t answer. I think most people feel their own happiness is more important than the rest of the world\'s, and maybe that\'s part of the problem but it\'s also human nature. I only wish we could all accept one other regardless of belief and culture and not try to force ways of life onto other people. Maybe I\'m naive for thinking that way, but so be it.\n
\n
\n I almost don\'t know what to think about this book. I\'m not even sure my brain still works, or if it ever worked right at all. This book has a way of making you think you know exactly what you believe about everything and then turning you completely upside down and making you question whether or not you believe anything at all about anything. It\'s the strangest thing. Hmmm. Doublethink? Perhaps. Perhaps not.\n
\n
\n Everything about this book is captivating. It\'s groundbreaking yet at the same time, purely classic. Ahead of its time, yet timeless. From Big Brother to the Thought Police, I was hooked and wanted to know more about it all.\n
\n
\n Basically, I think everyone should read 1984 at some point. You really have to be in the mood to work at reading it, though. But it\'s all worth it in the end. It\'s absolutely incredible and I loved it. I don\'t re-read many books but this will definitely be one of them. It is a hard read, but more importantly, it is a MUST read.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 32 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jun 06, 2008\n \n \n \n Amanda\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n \n\n\n \n \n I\'ve put off writing a review for 1984 because it\'s simply too daunting to do so. I liked 1984 even better after a second reading (bumping it up from a 4 star to a 5 star) because I think that, given the complexity of the future created by Orwell, multiple readings may be needed to take it all in. I thought it was genius the first time and appreciated that genius even more the second time.\n\n
\n
\n Orwell had a daunting task: creating a future nearly half a century away from the time period in which he w\n \n \n I\'ve put off writing a review for 1984 because it\'s simply too daunting to do so. I liked 1984 even better after a second reading (bumping it up from a 4 star to a 5 star) because I think that, given the complexity of the future created by Orwell, multiple readings may be needed to take it all in. I thought it was genius the first time and appreciated that genius even more the second time.\n
\n
\n Orwell had a daunting task: creating a future nearly half a century away from the time period in which he was writing. This future had to be its own complex, independent society, but it also had to be the natural end result of the totalitarianism Orwell witnessed in the communist and socialist regimes of World War II. That\'s part of the horror of 1984: this future is a recognizable one, even in the 21st century. It\'s easy to see how those in control can, through manipulation and propaganda, maintain that control simply for the sake of sating their own power hunger. It\'s easy to say "no one could ever tell me what to think or what to do," but the Party\'s use of Big Brother, the Thought Police, the Two-Minute Hate, and Doublethink make it easy to see how a person\'s ability to think independently and discern fiction from reality can be eroded when there is no touchstone to fact. Revising and rewriting the past to make certain that Big Brother and the Party are always correct has effectively eliminated historical accuracy. How can one think and reason in a society where everything is a fabrication?\n
\n
\n Another facet of 1984 that I find fascinating is the relationship between Winston and Julia. Winston claims Julia is a "rebel from the waist down," engaging in promiscuity and hedonistic indulgences forbidden by the Party. She doesn\'t care about social injustice or defining "reality"; she only longs for what will make her feel good in the moment and only rebels far enough to get what she wants. By comparison, Winston is an intellectual rebel, constantly worrying over the issues of truth and freedom and the real, unvarnished past, but limited in how far he\'s willing to push the boundaries (until he meets Julia). Together, they make a complete rebellion--physical and mental, but apart they find themselves impotent to stand up to the Party.\n
\n
\n A cautionary tale, social commentary, and exemplary example of dystopian fiction, 1984 is one of those perfect novels that not only entertains, but forces one to think about the danger associated with giving any one person or entity too much power or control over our lives--issues well worth consideration in post-9/11 America.\n
\n
\n Cross posted at\n \n This Insignificant Cinder\n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 17 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Nov 09, 2017\n \n \n \n Leo .\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Is Orwell turning in his grave? Does his epitaph read. "I fucking warned you! Don\'t say I never told you so! "\n\n
\n
\n Did he have a crystal fucking ball?\n
\n
\n ***\n
\n If you want truth, go out and see\n
\n
\n Not like in 1984, Richard Burton on TV\n
\n
\n Orwell must have been psychic, or was he in the know\n
\n
\n Cos\' what\'s going on in the world clearly shows\n
\n
\n That humanity is programmed through a TV screen\n
\n
\n Since its conception, its all its ever been\n
\n
\n News, films, dramas, sports, soaps and cartoons\n
\n
\n Leaving the masses wide eyed, like Buffoons\n
\n
\n Al\n \n \n Is Orwell turning in his grave? Does his epitaph read. "I fucking warned you! Don\'t say I never told you so! "\n
\n
\n Did he have a crystal fucking ball?\n
\n
\n ***\n
\n If you want truth, go out and see\n
\n
\n Not like in 1984, Richard Burton on TV\n
\n
\n Orwell must have been psychic, or was he in the know\n
\n
\n Cos\' what\'s going on in the world clearly shows\n
\n
\n That humanity is programmed through a TV screen\n
\n
\n Since its conception, its all its ever been\n
\n
\n News, films, dramas, sports, soaps and cartoons\n
\n
\n Leaving the masses wide eyed, like Buffoons\n
\n
\n All the rhetoric and propaganda, oozing about us, every place we look, and go\n
\n
\n It is everywhere, embedded, enveloping, as people to and fro\n
\n
\n Screens on buildings, bus stops, train stations, all over the place, fuelling our vices\n
\n
\n PC\'s, laptops, google glass, tablets and mobile devices\n
\n
\n Its in the ether, the air and the subconscious brain\n
\n
\n Whether one is aware or not, the information leaves its stain\n
\n
\n Orwell must have been psychic, or was he in the know\n
\n
\n Perpetual war, a bogeyman, terrorists, must be real, its all a TV show\n
\n
\n Censored press, hacking phones, spying on the masses\n
\n
\n Every email, phone call, text message, and google eye glasses\n
\n
\n Technocratic Dystopia, hunger games, people put into factions\n
\n
\n Not allowed to speak, monitoring our actions\n
\n
\n In the name of security, no person is free\n
\n
\n Unless your blood is Royal, or have connections to the family\n
\n
\n Or a valued member in Vatican State, purple robes, velvet glove, and iron fist\n
\n
\n A Freemason, a congressman, senator, president, PM, you get the gist\n
\n
\n Social engineering, eugenics, deep state, cabals and satanic cults\n
\n
\n Lodges, temples, hail, thunder and lightening bolts\n
\n
\n Rapture, ragnarok, jihad, ends of days TV\n
\n
\n In dramas, films, cartoons, its all we ever see\n
\n
\n Monsters and bogeymen, cold war, terrorism, and disease, and destruction\n
\n
\n People trafficking, drug smuggling, arms deals, and child abduction\n
\n
\n All entertainment, to keep the masses distracted\n
\n
\n No freedom of information, cos the juicy bits are redacted\n
\n
\n In the name of security, or for the security of a famous name\n
\n
\n The whole thing is inverted, its all a game\n
\n
\n Cos\' rules are lures, and laws are walls\n
\n
\n And all of the people are silly fools\n
\n
\n Glued to a PC, Mob Phone or TV screen\n
\n
\n Since its conception, its all its ever been\n
\n
\n Was Orwell a psychic, or was he in the know\n
\n
\n One things for certain, it won\'t be on a TV show\n
\n
\n By Leo.🐯👍\n
\n
\n
\n When one is young and immersed into the seas of academia one is asked what one wants to be when one grows up? Which pigeon hole? What label? What career?\n
\n
\n When a car driver loses control of the vehicle and strays from the path that was ahead, the car careers off the road. One might crash. One is no longer on the journey one originally set out on. One is lost. Off the beaten track.\n
\n
\n So, when one is a child and asked what career one wants, esoterically it means how can one be swayed or crashed and stopped from what one may want to be when one grows up. The only answer a child should give to their teacher (indoctrinater) is...HAPPY!👍🐯\n
\n
\n Who are these people? These authorities with all the powers?\n
\n
\n Deciding what we say, or do, or go, from their Ivory Towers\n
\n
\n A deviant neighbour moves in next door, behaviour abnormal, and hoarding trash\n
\n
\n Puts his waste in his shed, a festering, mouldy stash\n
\n
\n Attracting rats, mice, flies and vermin of all kinds\n
\n
\n Breaking other residents resolve, distorting their minds\n
\n
\n For when the community complain about it, every day, week in week out, all the time\n
\n
\n These authorities point the finger at us, accuse us of a Bloody Hate Crime!\n
\n
\n Rationale has been replaced, with the word Hate\n
\n
\n As the lines blur, in this New World Order, is it too late?\n
\n
\n To change this world? To take a stance? Maybe our last Chance!\n
\n
\n This world is going to Hell in a Shitstorm! If we don\'t restore the Earth\'s Balance. 🐯👍\n
\n
\n
\n Politics, or many ticks? Crawling all over society\n
\n
\n Police or Po-Lice? Crawling over people who are Free\n
\n
\n Choose and Lose, for they are not there, for the likes of You and Me\n
\n
\n Look around and thus, Beware!\n
\n
\n These parasites, are only there to Scare\n
\n
\n To enforce Order, in the chaos they Create\n
\n
\n On behest of the Magicians behind the curtains, the One\'s that preach Hate.\n
\n
\n In this Cube, this false construct, this Square.\n
\n
\n So look around, see the whole, and Beware!\n
\n
\n I am full aware of what is going on in this pursuit for a New World Order, an Old World Order, whereby the void between the few and the majority broadens. I am so frustrated how the Sheeple just seem to lap it up. Every day the Inter-NET tightens it\'s grip or, the World Wide Spider Web lures and traps millions with the Glitsy new smart phone. A cell phone. A smart cell phone that is all singing and dancing...Blah! Blah! Blah! It is called a Cell phone for a reason. Like the Net and the Web. Soon all appliances and mob devices will be Smart. If one does not own one then when 5G is rolled out and the Smart Grid comes into being, one will be left behind. Soon all money paid in wages or commerce will be digital and people will not survive in the New Virtual World unless one is chipped or connected to the 5G network. Understand that money is phony. It is paper or a figure on a PC screen. Soon to be a digital concept, like in the film In Time. Money used to be made of copper, silver and gold. This is when coins actually held value, worth it\'s weight in gold actually meant something. Then the Templars invented the Banking system, (now they are called Freemasons) a Fiat pyramid system that is illegal yet, no person seems to care. That is the way it is. Only because of ignorance. Acquiescence, Taxation is a fraud. It is theft. Time to wake up before it is too late.\n
\n
\n Club of Rome, Skull and Bones, Knights of the Realm, Knights of Malta, Rosicrucians, CFR, just a few of the Nefarious institutions. London School Of Economics and the Tavistock Institute. Oh! And the female freemasonic Eastern Star. Maybe I have said too much but, I don\'t care anymore.\n
\n
\n That is today\'s Rant.\n
\n
\n Everybody should read 1984 and also watch the film.\n
\n
\n Update:\n
\n
\n The Sex Pistols, a great British band\n
\n
\n Fully aware, of the hidden hand\n
\n
\n The entity, that controls, from most high, looking down\n
\n
\n Elevated, Godlike, Alpha, The Crown💓👍🐯\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 16 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Mar 27, 2017\n \n \n \n Starjustin\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n What can I possibly say about this amazing novel, 1984 by George Orwell, that hasn\'t been already said by many who have read the book for over half a century. When it is said that the book is \'haunting\', \'nightmarish\', and \'startling\' any reader would have to agree! This well known novel grips the reader from the beginning and does not even let go of the grip at the finished reading. A classic you won\'t want to miss if you haven\'t taken the time to read it yet.\n\n
\n I actually listened to this novel\n \n \n What can I possibly say about this amazing novel, 1984 by George Orwell, that hasn\'t been already said by many who have read the book for over half a century. When it is said that the book is \'haunting\', \'nightmarish\', and \'startling\' any reader would have to agree! This well known novel grips the reader from the beginning and does not even let go of the grip at the finished reading. A classic you won\'t want to miss if you haven\'t taken the time to read it yet.\n
\n I actually listened to this novel on audio and Simon Prebble was the \'perfect\' narrator.\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 33 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jun 25, 2011\n \n \n \n فهد الفهد\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n 0-favorites\n \n ,\n \n fiction-europe-british\n \n\n\n \n \n 1984\n\n
\n
\n نشر أورويل هذه الرواية بعد أربع سنوات من نشر روايته (مزرعة الحيوان)، كانت مزرعة الحيوان عن انهيار الحلم الشيوعي، وتبعثره على يد الستالينيين، وكيف أن المجتمع الشيوعي أصبح أسوأ بكثير من المجتمع الرأسمالي، وأنه ليست أرزاق العمال والفلاحين المهددة الآن تحت ظل الشيوعية، وإنما حرياتهم بل وحياتهم ذاتها.\n
\n
\n احتاج النظام السوفييتي إلى عشرين عام فقط بعد الثورة (1917 – 1937 م)، ليظهر أقبح وجوهه في مهزلة محاكمات موسكو، وحملات التطهير التي قتل فيها ما يقترب من المليوني شخص في الاتحاد السوفييتي، فلذا عندما\n \n \n 1984\n
\n
\n نشر أورويل هذه الرواية بعد أربع سنوات من نشر روايته (مزرعة الحيوان)، كانت مزرعة الحيوان عن انهيار الحلم الشيوعي، وتبعثره على يد الستالينيين، وكيف أن المجتمع الشيوعي أصبح أسوأ بكثير من المجتمع الرأسمالي، وأنه ليست أرزاق العمال والفلاحين المهددة الآن تحت ظل الشيوعية، وإنما حرياتهم بل وحياتهم ذاتها.\n
\n
\n احتاج النظام السوفييتي إلى عشرين عام فقط بعد الثورة (1917 – 1937 م)، ليظهر أقبح وجوهه في مهزلة محاكمات موسكو، وحملات التطهير التي قتل فيها ما يقترب من المليوني شخص في الاتحاد السوفييتي، فلذا عندما نشر أورويل كتابه هذا في سنة 1949 م، كان يتوقع بأن 35 سنة كافية ليتحول العالم كله إلى الصورة المرعبة التي رسمها في روايته هذه، حيث تنقسم الكرة الأرضية إلى ثلاث دول فقط، إيستاسيا وهي الدولة التي تضم بلاد شرق آسيا وجنوبها من الصين واليابان والهند وغيرها من الدول المحيطة، وأوراسيا وهي الدولة التي تسيطر على روسيا وأوروبا، وأوقيانيا التي تسيطر على الأمريكتين والجزيرة البريطانية.\n
\n
\n بطل الرواية وينستون سميث خمسيني يعيش في لندن ضمن حدود دولة أوقيانيا، والتي يسيطر عليها حزب وحيد يقوده الأخ الأكبر، والذي يحمل ملامح ستالينية لا يمكن أن يخطئها القارئ، الأخ الأكبر تتمحور حوله عبادة الشخصية كما ظهرت في الفترة الستالينية، وصوره في كل مكان من الدولة، وتحتها العبارة الشهيرة (الأخ الأكبر يراقبك)، وطيلة الرواية لا ندري هل الأخ الأكبر موجود أم لا؟ ربما يكون ميتاً منذ زمن بعيد، ولكن عبادة الشخصية تحوله إلى كائن أسطوري خالد، وتمحور كل شيء حول شخصه، وهي حالة مخزية جداً، لازالت موجودة في واقعنا المعاصر وإن بدرجات متفاوتة، ومثالها البارز كوريا الشمالية.\n
\n
\n نتعرف مع وينستون على الحالة الغريبة التي وصل إليها ذلكم المجتمع الشمولي، حيث أربع وزارات تدير البلد، وزارة السلم وهي المسئولة عن الحرب، وزارة الوفرة وهي المسئولة عن الاقتصاد، الذي نعرف من خلال الرواية أنه بعيد تماماً عن الوفرة، وزارة الحقيقة وهي مشابهة لوزارة الإعلام ولكنها متخصصة في نشر الأكاذيب والشائعات، وأخيراً وزارة الحب وهي الوزارة المرعبة التي تشرف على شرطة الفكر، وعلى عمليات التعذيب المنهجية للمعارضين، والتي تتابع الناس من خلال شاشات الرصد الموجودة في كل مكان حتى في منازل أتباع الحزب.\n
\n
\n قد تبدو لنا تسمية الوزارات ساخرة، حيث تقوم كل وزارة بمهام معاكسة لاسمها، ولكننا نكتشف أن وراء التسمية فلسفة رهيبة، هي فلسفة التفكير المزدوج، التي يحاول الحزب من خلالها قتل كل فكر مناهض، هذه الفلسفة نفهمها ونفهم المراد منها في الفصول الأخيرة من الرواية.\n
\n
\n في هذا المجتمع المخيف، يحاول وينستون المشوش، والذي يعمل في وزارة الحقيقة، حيث يقوم بمهام تعديل الأخبار القديمة لتتوافق مع معطيات الحاضر، وهي مهمة يحرص عليها الحزب ليتلاعب بالتاريخ ويجعله يأتي وفقاً لفلسفته وخططه، يحاول وينستون البحث عن الحقيقة، التساؤل، هل كان الأمر هكذا دائماً؟ لا يوجد ذاكرة للمجتمع، لقد تلاعب بها الحزب، أعاد كتابة التاريخ ليجعله يبدأ من الثورة التي أتت بالحزب، وسلطته على رقاب الناس، فلذا صار وينستون لا يعرف إلا أطياف من المعلومات عن أوضاع ما قبل الثورة، ما قبل الحزب، وفي رحلته في البحث عن الحقيقة، تنشأ قصة حب خفية بينه وبين جوليا، وهي فتاة من الحزب، تتظاهر بأنها مؤمنة بالمبادئ قلباً وقالباً، ولكنها هي من يقود وينستون في قصة الحب هذه التي يخفيانها عن شاشات الرصد، وعن شرطة الفكر.\n
\n
\n في أثناء هذا يلتقي وينستون بأوبراين، أحد قادة الدائرة الداخلية للحزب، والذي يكشف له أنه مؤمن بأفكار عدو الحزب الأساس (عمانوئيل جولدشتين)، والوصف الذي يعطينا إياه المؤلف لجولدشتين هذا يذكرنا بتروتسكي، يمني أوبراين وينستون بثورة قادمة، ويعطيه كتاباً لجولدشتين يقرؤه وينستون أثناء لقاءاته بجوليا.\n
\n
\n يتم القبض على وينستون وجوليا أثناء أحد لقاءاتهما، حيث يكتشفان أنهما كانا مراقبين منذ البداية، وأن كل ما فعلاه رصدته شرطة الفكر، بل والأسوأ هو أن أوبراين ذاته من شرطة الفكر، وهو من سيتولى تعذيب وتحطيم شخصية وينستون.\n
\n
\n يصف لنا المؤلف وبدقة التعذيب الذي يتعرض له وينستون، وهو ليس تعذيب جسدي فقط، وإنما هو عملية منهجية يتم فيها غسل دماغ وينستون، وتلقينه التفكير المزدوج الذي يجعله يصدق أن 2 زائد 2 يساوي خمسة عندما يقول له الحزب ذلك، لا يكفي أن يقولها خوفاً، لا... وإنما يجب أن يؤمن بها في قلبه، وهذا هو الطريق الذي سيحمله إلى محبة الأخ الأكبر.\n
\n
\n هذه العملية المرعبة نتابع نتائجها المؤلمة على وينستون حتى النهاية، المرعب هو أننا نعرف من خلال التاريخ أن أورويل لم يبتكر كل هذا، فبرامج التعذيب هذه مطبقة خلال الفترة السوفياتية، حتى أن المعذبين كانوا عندما يعدمون، يبكون، لا على أنفسهم، وإنما لأنهم يشعرون بأنهم خذلوا الأخ الأكبر، خذلوا الزعيم الأبدي.\n
\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 26 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Feb 08, 2017\n \n \n \n Joe\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Social media is a cage full of starved rats and all of us have our heads stuck in there now, like it or not.\n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 8 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jan 29, 2011\n \n \n \n أحمد أبازيد Ahmad Abazed\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n favorites\n \n\n\n \n \n " انتبه : الأخ الكبير يراقبك ! "\n\n
\n رواية صادمة تمثّل زلزالا للوعي و اللاوعي لدى كلّ من يقرؤها , هذه الرواية التي شكّلت ذروة عبقريّة جورج أورويل و تأثّره و تأثيره في الوعي العالمي و التاريخ الحديث .\n
\n الأخ الكبير عند أورويل له مرادفات في ثقافتنا العربية الراهنة ( مثلا : الأخ العقيد , القائد الخالد , القائد الضرورة ... أو الرئيس الشاب ! ) هذا الاختلاف في التسمية هو توافق عبقريّ في مأساويّته لدولة " أوقيانيا " مع دول مثل : سورية و العراق و ليبيا و تونس و مصر ... و باقي أنظمتنا الثوريّة التي تأكلنا و تفتّ\n \n \n " انتبه : الأخ الكبير يراقبك ! "\n
\n رواية صادمة تمثّل زلزالا للوعي و اللاوعي لدى كلّ من يقرؤها , هذه الرواية التي شكّلت ذروة عبقريّة جورج أورويل و تأثّره و تأثيره في الوعي العالمي و التاريخ الحديث .\n
\n الأخ الكبير عند أورويل له مرادفات في ثقافتنا العربية الراهنة ( مثلا : الأخ العقيد , القائد الخالد , القائد الضرورة ... أو الرئيس الشاب ! ) هذا الاختلاف في التسمية هو توافق عبقريّ في مأساويّته لدولة " أوقيانيا " مع دول مثل : سورية و العراق و ليبيا و تونس و مصر ... و باقي أنظمتنا الثوريّة التي تأكلنا و تفتّتنا و تسحقنا منذ عقود , هذا التوافق في سايكولوجية الاستبداد و خلق القطيع و و تنصيب الصنم للجماهير , و توجيه غضبها نحو الوجهة التي ترضي " الأخ الكبير " , هذا التوافق في مفهوم "الحقيقة" الذي تلعب على أوتاره كلّ الأنظمة الشموليّة لتختصر البلد و تاريخه و ثقافته و حضارته و حروبه و سلامه في العقليّة الجمعيّة بأفق الحزب الحاكم و الوثن الأعلى فيه . ( أتذكّر هنا شعارات مثل : عراق صدّام أو سورية الأسد !! ) ـ\n
\n كيف نصنع الخوف .. كيف نقتل التفكير .. كيف تمحو اللغة .. كيف نجمّد الزمن .. كيف نصنع حدود النظرة\n
\n :\n
\n " الله هو السلطة "\n
\n هذاكان شعار الحزب , و هو الشعار المطبّق في كلّ الأنظمة الشمولية , لا إله سوى السلطة .. تخلق ما تشاء و تقرّر ما تشاء و تفعل ما تشاء , ولا يعلم حدود الرئيس و قدرته إلّا هو , هو الواحد الأحد و الفرد الصمد المحيي المميت الرزاق القهّار وحده !\n
\n هذه الأنظمة لا تريد أن تحكمك و تنهبك فقط , إنّها تريد أن تمسخ إنسانيّتك لتكون مجرّد روبوت مسيّر بيدها و لذلك كتب ونستون في مذكّراته :\n
\n " هم يريدون أن يلغوا إنسانيّتك .. ولذلك فأن تحافظ على إنسانيّتك حتى موتك هو ما يعني انتصارك عليهم , حتى لو لم يؤدّ ذلك إلى أيّ نتائج ! "\n
\n لماذا نعذّب لماذا نسرق لماذا نستبدّ لماذا نقتل لماذا نحكم طيلة حياتنا ثمّ نورّث الجمهوريّة لأبنائنا ؟!:\n
\n " إننا ندرك أنه ما من احد يمسك بزمام السلطة و هو ينتوي التخلّي عنها , إن السلطة ليست وسيلة بل غاية , فالمرء لا يقيم حكما استبداديا لحماية الثورة , و إنما يشعل الثورة لإقامة حكم استبدادي , إن الهدف من الاضطهاد هو الاضطهاد , و الهدف من التعذيب هو التعذيب , و غاية السلطة هي السلطة ... هل بدأت تفهم ما أقول الآن ؟!! "\n
\n هذا جواب أوبراين !\n
\n 1984 رواية يجب على كلّ عربيّ أن يقرأها ليرى رموزه و أصنامه مرسومة , و ليجد نفسه أيضا مرسوما داخلها كما شاءت أنظمة الثورة و حكم الحزب الواحد و الفرد الواحد .\n
\n 1984 بكلّ ما تنبّا و كتب و تعمّق و حلّل أورويل فيها عمل عبقريّ يقرأ و يقرأ و يقرأ .\n
\n الشيء الوحيد الذي لم يتوقّعه أورويل : هو أن التونسيّين و المصريين و اليمنيين و الجزائريين ( و آمل أن أكتب فيما بعد و السوريين و اللليبيّين... و .. و.. الخ ) سوف يثبتون بدمهم و حرّيتهم خطأ " النهاية " !!!ـ\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 15 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Oct 11, 2008\n \n \n \n Ahmad Sharabiani\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n fiction\n \n ,\n \n classic\n \n ,\n \n literature\n \n ,\n \n 1001-book\n \n ,\n \n dystopia\n \n ,\n \n 20th-century\n \n\n\n \n \n 547. Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell\n\n
\n Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949 by English author George Orwell. The novel is set in Airstrip One, formerly Great Britain, a province of the superstate Oceania, whose residents are victims of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance and public manipulation. Oceania\'s political ideology, euphemistically named English Socialism (shortened to "Ingsoc" in Newspeak, the government\'s invented langua\n \n \n 547.\tNineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell\n
\n Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949 by English author George Orwell. The novel is set in Airstrip One, formerly Great Britain, a province of the superstate Oceania, whose residents are victims of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance and public manipulation. Oceania\'s political ideology, euphemistically named English Socialism (shortened to "Ingsoc" in Newspeak, the government\'s invented language) is enforced by the privileged, elite Inner Party. Via the "Thought Police", the Inner Party persecutes individualism and independent thinking, which are regarded as "thoughtcrimes".\n
\n عنوانها: 1984؛ ۱۹۸۴؛ هزار و نهصد وهشتاد و چهار 1984 - نویسنده: جورج اورول؛ (نیلوفر)؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش: سال 1982 میلادی\n
\n عنوان: 1984 (۱۹۸۴)؛ نویسنده: جورج اورول؛ مترجم: صالح حسینی؛ تهران، نیلوفر، 1361؛ در 272 ص؛ چاپ دوم 1364؛ سوم 1367؛ چهارم 1369؛ شابک: 9644480449؛ پنجم 1374؛ ششم 1376؛ هفتم 1380؛ هشتم 1382؛ یازدهم و دوازدهم 1388؛ شابک: 9789644480447؛ سیزدهم 1389؛ در 312 ص؛ چاپ چهاردهم 1395؛ عنوان گسترده: هزار و نهصد وهشتاد و چهار؛ موضوع: داستانهای نویسندگلن انگلیسی - سده 20 م\n
\n مترجمین دیگر: رضا زارع، در 384 ص، قزوین آزرمیدخت، 1392؛ خدیجه خدایی، در 318 ص، تبریز، یاران، 1391؛ نرگس حیدری منجیلی، در 352 ص، تهران، اردیبهشت، 1389،؛ مریم فیروزبخت، در 392 ص، تهران، حکایتی دگر، 1389؛ زهره زندیه، در 400 ص، قزوین، آزرمیدخت؛ کتایون شاهوردی، در 465 ص، تهران، فراموشی، 1396؛ فهیمه رحمتی، در 400 ص، تهران، ماهانه، 1394؛ امیر سالارکیا، در 384 ص؛ تهران، هنر پارینه، 1394؛ مرتضی، سعیدی تبار، در 384 ص، کرمان، انتشارات ولی، 1393؛ محمدعلی جدیری، تهران، اختر، چاپ یازدهم 1392، در 399 ص؛ چاپ سیزدهم، تبریز، سومر، 1393، در 283 ص؛ وحید کیان، تهران، کارگاه فیلم و گرافیک سپاس، 1394، در 375 ص؛ حمیدرضا بلوچ، در 288 ص، تهران، گهبد، 1384، چاپ دوم 1385، سوم 1386، پنجم 1388؛ چاپ دیگر: تهران، مجید، 1386؛ در 288 ص؛ چاپ هشتم 1392؛\n
\n کتاب «1984» را «اریک آرتور بلر» با نام مستعار «جرج اورول»؛ نویسنده و شاعر انگلیسی بنوشته است و تا\u200c به\u200c امروز به بیش از 65 زبان گوناگون برگردان، و میلیون\u200cها نسخه از آن فروخته شده است. با توجه به تصویر روشنی که اورول در داستان از نظامهای تمامیت\u200cخواه ارائه می\u200cدهد، انگار کنید بیانیه\u200c ای سیاسی برای رد همه ی نظام\u200cهای توتالیتر و کمونیستی است. «جهان اورولی»، 1984 داستان وینستون اسمیت را روایت می\u200cکند؛ فردی که نماد یک شهروند عادی دگراندیش در دنیای اورولی ست. رمان در سال 1949 میلادی نوشته شده، زمانی\u200cکه جنگ دوم جهانگیر به\u200c تازگی پایان یافته بود؛ و جهانیان خطر تسلیم\u200c شدن در پیشگاه دیکتاتورها را نیک فهمیده بودند. در آن زمان جنگ سرد هنوز آغاز نشده بود، و در دنیای غرب نیز هنوز روشنفکران بسیاری بودند که از کمونیسم هواداری و دفاع میکردند. در واقع اورول کتاب را برای اخطار به غربیان، برای گوشزد کردن خطر گسترش کمونیسم نوشته است؛ اما داستان این اثر را می\u200cتوان به شرایط حاکم بر تمام جوامع تحت سلطه\u200c ی حکومت\u200cها\u200cی استبدادی نیز گسترش داد. داستان در سال 1984 میلادی (35 سال پس از تاریخ نگارش کتاب) در شهر لندن رخ می\u200cدهد. پس از جنگ جهانگیر، حاکمان کشورهای قدرتمند، به این نتیجه رسیده\u200c اند که اگر جهان به روند افزایش ثروت ادامه دهد، ارکان جامعه\u200c ی طبقاتی به خطر می\u200cافتد؛ و حکومتها سرنگون میشوند. آن\u200cها تنها راه جلوگیری از این امر را نابود کردن ثروت تولید شده در جنگی بی\u200c پایان می\u200cبینند. ا. شربیانی\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 6 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Apr 25, 2014\n \n \n \n Ahmed\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n إنجليزى\n \n\n\n \n \n \n\n
\n كل ما تشوف صور الرئيس السيسي حفظه الله في الشوارع، اِفتكر الأخ الكبير، وكل ما تشوف الإعلام المصري، افتكر الرواية دي، وغسيل الدماغ اللي بيُمارس علينا.\n
\n
\n المؤسسات المصرية أصبحت بتمنح مميزات لمن يبلغ عن (إرهابي) , من فرص\n
\n عمل وخلافه , يعني بورقة وسخة ممكن تأذي جارك اللي بينك وبينه مشاكل أو تسجن زميلك اللي بينافسك في الشغل , يعني المفروض نعمل لجورج أورويل مقام ونطوف حواليه.\n
\n
\n الرواية التى سنسجن بسببها جميعا , ونوضع فى الأغلال ويركبونا على حمير بالشقلوب ويلفوا بينا الأسواق وهاتف يهتف : انهم يدعون إلى دين جد\n \n \n \n \n
\n كل ما تشوف صور الرئيس السيسي حفظه الله في الشوارع، اِفتكر الأخ الكبير، وكل ما تشوف الإعلام المصري، افتكر الرواية دي، وغسيل الدماغ اللي بيُمارس علينا.\n
\n
\n المؤسسات المصرية أصبحت بتمنح مميزات لمن يبلغ عن (إرهابي) , من فرص\n
\n عمل وخلافه , يعني بورقة وسخة ممكن تأذي جارك اللي بينك وبينه مشاكل أو تسجن زميلك اللي بينافسك في الشغل , يعني المفروض نعمل لجورج أورويل مقام ونطوف حواليه.\n
\n
\n الرواية التى سنسجن بسببها جميعا , ونوضع فى الأغلال ويركبونا على حمير بالشقلوب ويلفوا بينا الأسواق وهاتف يهتف : انهم يدعون إلى دين جديد , يدعون إلى عدم تقديس الحاكم وسلطته .\n
\n إنها الرواية التى يقبض على مالكها (لا فى الاتحاد السوفيتى ولا ما يشبهه) بل فى ام الدنيا مصر .\n
\n
\n أنا قرأت كم كتب مترجمه عظيم من حيث الكم (حتى انى وانا صغير) كنت بقول صعب ان حاجه اجنبيه تبهرنى تانى(هطل بعيد عنكم ) . ايه اللى ممكن يبهرنى بعد تولستوى او دستويفسكى او شكسبير او هوجو اوغيرهم وغيرهم .\n
\n وخاصة لو روايه ذات طابع سياسى بحت لجوروج اورويل . (انا ما بحبش الروايات السياسيه البحته)\n
\n
\n لكنى فوجئت بوجهة نظر مستقبليه عظيمه لاديب صاحب قلم ادبى راقى بيكتب عن النفس الانسانيه بصورة بليغه تجبرك انك تشغل دماغك وتندمج فى العمل الموضوع امامك. عمل يبين لك الحقيقه البشريه فى اسمى واحط صورها.\n
\n لو كان اورويل ديكتاتور سابق لم يكن لينجح فى تقديم هذا العمل بهذه الجوده. تحليل دقيق لنظام الحكم القمعى يبين لك كيفية اداء هذه الانظمه .\n
\n لمن شاهد فيلم (V for Vendetta ) ممكن يكون فكرة سطحيه عن النظام المقصود . اينعم الروايه حولت لفيلم سينمائى ولكنى لم اشاهده .\n
\n
\n 1984 تتحدث عن اى نظام قمعى شمولى وكل نظام قمعى شمولى .\n
\n الاخ\n
\n الكبير هو كل ديكتاتور افتكر نفسه اله فى تاريخ البشريه : هو هتلر هو موسولينى هو عبدالناصر هو صدام هو حافظ الاسد وابنه هو ستالين هو تيتو و فرانكو وسالازار وغيرهم وغيرهم\n
\n هو كل حاكم اتخذ من سلطته صنم ليعبده الناس.\n
\n
\n 1984 هو زمن كل مجتمع متخلف ارتضى ان تسوقه انظمته الى عصور التخلف والجهاله\n
\n 1984 شهادة وتأريخ سيظل حقيقى الى ان تقوم الساعه.\n
\n هى وصمة عار على كل ديكتاتور وعلى كل مجتمع متخلف .\n
\n ايها الساده : الادب فى اسمى صوره عندما يؤرخ للماضى والحاضر والمستقبل وهذا ما فعله اورويل\n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 10 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jun 09, 2018\n \n \n \n Bookdragon Sean\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n \n Recommends it for:\n \n \n fahrenheit 451 fans\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n 4-star-reads\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n “The best books... are those that tell you what you know already.”\n \n \n \n\n
\n
\n Just about everything Orwell says in\n \n 1984\n \n is a maniacal truism. In some twisted form, everything reflects the truth of reality.\n
\n
\n Of course there are exaggerations, though nothing is far from plausibility. We are controlled by our governments, and often in ways we are not consciously aware of. Advertisements, marketing campaigns and political events are all designed for us to elicit a certain response and think in a desired way\n \n \n \n \n \n “The best books... are those that tell you what you know already.”\n \n \n \n
\n
\n Just about everything Orwell says in\n \n 1984\n \n is a maniacal truism. In some twisted form, everything reflects the truth of reality.\n
\n
\n Of course there are exaggerations, though nothing is far from plausibility. We are controlled by our governments, and often in ways we are not consciously aware of. Advertisements, marketing campaigns and political events are all designed for us to elicit a certain response and think in a desired way.\n
\n
\n \n 1984\n \n takes this to the extreme. Cultural brainwashing becomes the chief goal. Assimilation into a passionless (and completely ignorant) mind-set becomes the most effective means of keeping the population down. If you can make a man forget (or deny) his past then he knows of no situation better than his current state: it’s all he knows, so why would he act to change it? Subjugation becomes normality.\n
\n
\n \n \n “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.”\n \n \n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n Big brother does this by harsh policing, excessive surveillance and language manipulation. The streets are claustrophobic and the people (the workers) can escape nothing. Every action, every word spoken, is recorded. The police are ready to grab anyone who steps remotely out of line. Controlling language is perhaps the most effective thought control method I’ve ever heard of. If language can be broken down into the absolute basics, the simplest and ordinary units, then people can only express themselves on a very minor level. They cannot think beyond their daily tasks because there are no words that connote dreams and fantasy.\n
\n
\n Step out of line and you are killed, though not before being dragged to room 101 for torture and even stronger methods of thought control. As such through the plot the book depicts a stark transformation, a transformation of man who was once willing to fight and to think but falls into one of the ingenious traps big brother sets for him to expose his criminality. Orwell’s words are frightening because of their eerie parallels with reality. He shows us that we are not so far from big brother as we may think.\n
\n
\n \n “We do not merely destroy our enemies; we change them.”\n \n
\n
\n Unlike\n \n Animal Farm\n \n this also leaves much to the imagination. It’s a much more successful book and one that once it has been read, it certainly cannot be unread.\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 14 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jun 25, 2014\n \n \n \n Lisa\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n favorites\n \n ,\n \n havanas-en-masse\n \n ,\n \n postliterate-fiction\n \n ,\n \n so-good-it-hurts\n \n ,\n \n unforgettable\n \n ,\n \n 1001-books-to-read-before-you-die\n \n\n\n \n \n Doubleplusgood Maxitruth in Oldspeak on Doublethink and Crimestop!\n\n
\n
\n (Translation from Newspeak: Excellent, accurate analysis of oppressive, selective society in well-written Standard English reflecting on the the capacity to hold two contradictory opinions for truth at the same time and on the effectiveness of protective stupidity as a means to keep a power structure stable.)\n
\n
\n There is not much left to say about this prophetic novel by Orwell which has not been said over and over again since its pu\n \n \n \n \n \n \n Doubleplusgood Maxitruth in Oldspeak on Doublethink and Crimestop!\n
\n
\n (Translation from Newspeak: Excellent, accurate analysis of oppressive, selective society in well-written Standard English reflecting on the the capacity to hold two contradictory opinions for truth at the same time and on the effectiveness of protective stupidity as a means to keep a power structure stable.)\n
\n
\n There is not much left to say about this prophetic novel by Orwell which has not been said over and over again since its publication at the beginning of the Cold War in 1949. There are obviously elements which refer directly to Stalinist socialism, and the life conditions of people in the 1940s, but what strikes as sadly true, not for Communist propaganda behind the historical Iron Curtain, but for the celebrated democracies in the Western tradition, is the idea of rewriting history and altering facts a posteriori into their opposite to suit political agendas, and the usurpation of scientific and political language to follow a path of absolute brainwashing. Western reality has caught up with 1984 in the era of “alternative facts” instead of falsehoods, and the denunciation of non-existent massacres to create fear, and an increasingly “blackwhite” take on society in general.\n
\n
\n Reading this novel for the third time with the speeches of the current President of the United States and his followers ringing in my ears, it is hard not to cringe at the reduction of language that Orwell predicted in "1984" (1949):\n
\n
\n "Don\'t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.”\n
\n
\n “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”\n
\n
\n Just listening to the current reductionist rhetoric, expressing a less than shallow understanding of basic political thought and knowledge, shows the increasing spread of Newspeak at the highest level of command in democratic societies, claiming to be celebrating education, equality, freedom and human rights.\n
\n
\n “So sad! Very dishonest! Total loser! You are fake news! Russia is fake news! The failing NYTimes! It’s great! It’s SO great! You wouldn’t believe how great that is (doubleplusgreat, I assume...). The largest! The best! Running like a fine-tuned machine! The least racist! The most humble! The one with the best polls, for the negative ones are fake!”\n
\n
\n - Doublethink and crimestop nonstop!\n
\n
\n The problem with dictatorships, and dogmas of a specific faith, is that they will never shy away from usurping and then destroying the generally accepted conventions of communication if it serves their purposes. Thus a creationist believer in the literal truth of the Bible will use the argument of “enquiry”, “controversy” or “evidence” in order to attack real scientists with their own vocabulary, while refusing to question the default setting of their own dogmas, which cannot deliver any evidence at all, being as real as the Bowling Green massacre. The argument of “controversy” is a one-way road to kill opposition with their own weapons while staying safely within the “protective stupidity” (crimestop) of absolute, monofocal faith. The “tolerance” of the open-minded scientist becomes a weapon for the fundamentalist.\n
\n
\n \n (view spoiler)\n \n \n [ (One example of typical crimestop (=protective stupidity) is the Creation Museum in Kentucky, US, advertising their love for science, while starting with the slogan "Be prepared to believe":\n
\n "Creationists love science! In fact, the word science means “knowledge.” We invite you to dive into the Bible and the scientific evidence with us to gather as much knowledge about God’s creation as you can. You’ll learn about the different types of science and discover facts and logical arguments you might have never considered. When you start with the Bible as your ultimate authority, you’re ready to discover creation science."\n
\n They also have "REAL CREATION SCIENTISTS" (no kidding, they are real, not fake, according to website):\n
\n "Did you know the Creation Museum employs PhD creation scientists who teach about anatomy, astronomy, biology, geology, and more from a biblical worldview? ")\n \n (hide spoiler)\n \n ]\n \n
\n
\n The same selective use of language, a consistent tool to exert power in “1984”, can be seen in the Pro Life movement, a violent anti-abortion, anti-contraception fundamentalist Christian group, whose derogatory, misogynistic vocabulary strongly calls Atwood’s\n \n The Handmaid\'s Tale\n \n to mind. Their aim, they claim, is to protect unborn life, which sounds honourable until you start to think about their opinions about and treatment of human beings that already dwell on earth: they are conservatives, mostly pro weapons, pro (ideological) wars, pro death penalty, anti welfare, anti climate change and anti health care. That does not rhyme well with the militant need to control female sexuality, labelled protection of the foetus’ right. Controlling sexuality is a major topic in Orwell’s dystopia as well - goodsex being newspeak for chastity.\n
\n
\n What struck me as overwhelmingly sad in the main character of "1984", which did not catch my attention the first two times I read the novel, was the breaking down of the man’s sanity and mental capacities, rather than his body. The scary development for Winston Smith is not the prospect of torture, once he starts rebelling against the oppressive (“free”) society, it is the fear to lose his humanity in the process:\n
\n
\n “To die hating them, that was freedom.”\n
\n
\n This idea, expressed by Ionesco in his fabulous play\n \n Rhinocéros\n \n as well, is denied Orwell’s main character, however. He is broken, not only physically, but mentally, and after torture of unimaginable dimensions, his closing lines show complete surrender, body and soul, to the evil brainwashing machinery of Big Brother:\n
\n
\n “He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother!”\n
\n
\n Put this man into the context of an interview on television, where the President of the United States is questioned on his position regarding torture as a means to receive “information”. Dodging the question, he speaks about an undefined opposition “chopping off Christians’ heads”, thus creating the necessary atmosphere of fear to evade direct challenge, and then, in his reduced, stupid language, he says:\n
\n
\n “Torture? Do I feel it works? Absolutely, I feel it works.”\n
\n
\n And depending on what is your desired outcome (“confession” of facts, alternative or otherwise), it does. Unfortunately. You can force a human being to speak against his or her will, using torture. And as long as you are not finicky regarding the accuracy of the received confession, you will be able to report results. An easy task for any doublethinker.\n
\n
\n As for CRIMESTOP - the protective stupidity practised by most dogmatic, orthodox people in all parts of the world - that is the root of the evil. And it can only be challenged with a proper, objective, fact-based, politically and religiously untainted EDUCATION! And please do not confuse that with information! Information, as we know, can be “bad”. Really bad. Rotten. So unfair. So dishonest. The most dishonest information in the world. Total loser information.\n
\n
\n Education Against Crimestop Now!\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 51 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Sep 21, 2017\n \n \n \n James Trevino\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n I reread this recently, knowing my mind from a few years ago is different from my mind now. But it was surprisingly just as scary! Maybe even more so, if that is possible!!\n\n
\n
\n I wonder if there is someone who has read 1984 and has not felt angry and helpless. It is a good book. It is so good that it made my want to throw away my Kindle. And that is a lot, considering the last time that happened was when I read about The Red Wedding in George R.R. Martin\'s series.\n
\n
\n I also wonder if this world Orwell d\n \n \n I reread this recently, knowing my mind from a few years ago is different from my mind now. But it was surprisingly just as scary! Maybe even more so, if that is possible!!\n
\n
\n I wonder if there is someone who has read 1984 and has not felt angry and helpless. It is a good book. It is so good that it made my want to throw away my Kindle. And that is a lot, considering the last time that happened was when I read about The Red Wedding in George R.R. Martin\'s series.\n
\n
\n I also wonder if this world Orwell describes is that far from ours. Big Brother may have become a stupid internet meme and an even stupider TV show (if there are fans here sorrynotsorry), but that somehow makes it even more frightening. In 1984 the oppression is very in your face, but in reality it is hidden through nice words and fancy laws.\n
\n
\n At the end of the day, it really makes you ask yourself if safety and security are really what you want. And if they are worth the price...\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 7 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Dec 05, 2010\n \n \n \n Emily May\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n \n\n\n \n \n This was the book that started my love affair with the dystopian genre. And maybe indirectly influenced my decision to do a politics degree. I was only 12 years old when I first read it but I suddenly saw how politics could be taken and manipulated to tell one hell of a scary and convincing story. I\'m a lot more well-read now but, back then, this was a game-changer. I started to think about things differently. I started to think about 2 + 2 = 5 and I wanted to read more books that explored the i\n \n \n This was the book that started my love affair with the dystopian genre. And maybe indirectly influenced my decision to do a politics degree. I was only 12 years old when I first read it but I suddenly saw how politics could be taken and manipulated to tell one hell of a scary and convincing story. I\'m a lot more well-read now but, back then, this was a game-changer. I started to think about things differently. I started to think about 2 + 2 = 5 and I wanted to read more books that explored the idea of control.\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 19 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jan 12, 2016\n \n \n \n Joey Woolfardis\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n 2016\n \n ,\n \n bookshelf\n \n ,\n \n ce20\n \n ,\n \n champion\n \n ,\n \n masculine\n \n ,\n \n sterling\n \n\n\n \n \n Read as part of\n \n The Infinite Variety Reading Challenge\n \n , based on the BBC\'s Big Read Poll of 2003.\n\n
\n
\n \n \n "For, if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realise that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away."\n \n \n
\n
\n \n Nineteen Eighty-Four\n \n is an insanely relevant novel in this day and\n \n \n Read as part of\n \n The Infinite Variety Reading Challenge\n \n , based on the BBC\'s Big Read Poll of 2003.\n
\n
\n \n \n "For, if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realise that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away."\n \n \n
\n
\n \n Nineteen Eighty-Four\n \n is an insanely relevant novel in this day and age, but it\'s also a rather soothing novel that contains some of the horrors that could never come to pass, though there are some horrific parallels between the England in the book and some countries around the world in the 21st Century.\n
\n
\n Winston is a very complex, sane person in a world full of insanity and utter destitution. Julia is on par with Winston, but other than the charming and mysterious O\'Brien, no other character is developed enough to be anything but a filler, someone to push the plot along. In any other novel this would be a bad thing, but in this world it is perfect, and it\'s exactly what those people are in any case.\n
\n
\n It is so superbly written I cannot fault it at all concerning that. At the beginning I was drawn in so far that I was almost in love. It was a five-star book up until Julia turned up: whilst I completely understand her character and her paradoxical nature (being so openly physically against Big Brother and yet intelligence-wise and mentally not), I did not like her even remotely, but I understood her character fully. The other thing that put me off was the huge info-dump. Whilst I completely understood that this was an intentional info-drop and it really could not have been conveyed to either the reader or the character in any other way, it really made the whole thing very disjointed. Again, it felt hugely intentional but I still did not enjoy it.\n
\n
\n Overall, there\'s really nothing I can fault except my own opinions. Good writing is Fact: punctuation in the correct places, the right use of words, syntax and all that; building up worlds and characters to a certain degree of solidness. Enjoyment of writing is Opinion: characters being likeable, understandable; worlds being full or non-descript. This was a perfect book that I simply had a few too many low opinions of to be delighted by it completely.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n \n Blog\n \n |\n \n Instagram\n \n |\n \n Twitter\n \n |\n \n Pinterest\n \n |\n \n Shop\n \n |\n \n Etsy\n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 5 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n May 30, 2008\n \n \n \n Cecily\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n classics\n \n ,\n \n scifi-future-speculative-fict\n \n ,\n \n dystopian\n \n ,\n \n language-related\n \n\n\n \n \n \n Revised for 2017, with added "Alternative Facts"\n \n\n
\n
\n \n
\n \n Ten Shades of Grey?\n \n
\n
\n The colour of this book is grey, relentless grey: of skin, sky, food, floor, walls, mind, life itself. Added piquancy comes from general decay, drudgery, exploitation, chronic sickness, and malaise.\n
\n
\n There is also sex and (non-sexual) bondage, domination, and torture.\n
\n
\n I don’t expect a dystopian book to be happy reading, but this reread was far grimmer than I remembered it, partly because I read it immediately after the lyrical beaut\n \n \n \n Revised for 2017, with added "Alternative Facts"\n \n
\n
\n \n
\n \n Ten Shades of Grey?\n \n
\n
\n The colour of this book is grey, relentless grey: of skin, sky, food, floor, walls, mind, life itself. Added piquancy comes from general decay, drudgery, exploitation, chronic sickness, and malaise.\n
\n
\n There is also sex and (non-sexual) bondage, domination, and torture.\n
\n
\n I don’t expect a dystopian book to be happy reading, but this reread was far grimmer than I remembered it, partly because I read it immediately after the lyrical beauty of another dystopia,\n \n Fahrenheit 451\n \n , reviewed\n \n HERE\n \n , and partly because I’ve probably watched Terry Gilliam’s magical film,\n \n Brazil\n \n so many times (though he claimed he had not read the book before making the film).\n
\n
\n Nevertheless, more than 50 years after it was written, 1984 is still powerful, important, and relevant - a feat EL James’ “Fifty Shades” books are unlikely to achieve. On the other hand, I gather Fifty Shades lacks page after page of heavy-handed political theory, so on that criterion, it might be ahead of 1984.\n
\n
\n “\n \n If there is hope, it lies in the proles\n \n ” - they are not any shade of grey.\n
\n
\n \n Have We Reached 1984? (written in 2015)\n \n
\n
\n In some ways, this book is very dated.\n
\n
\n •\tThe underlying\n \n misogyny\n \n is unchallenged (Winston “\n \n disliked nearly all women, and especially the young pretty ones… who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party\n \n ” and he quickly goes from wanting to rape and murder a woman (he even tells her!) to lusting after “her youthful body desperate for him” and feeling “he had a right to” her). On the other hand, Winston is uncritical - enthusiastic even - about her promiscuity.\n
\n
\n •\tRelated to that - and to Fahrenheit 451 - Derek (Guilty of thoughtcrime) wrote in a group discussion: "there\'s a distinct echo in both books of the\n \n Garden of Eden\n \n story, with Eve tempting Adam to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. And in each case, it\'s a denial of the dogma that this is the original sin."\n
\n
\n •\tA contemporary writer would probably avoid the lengthy passages of\n \n exposition and theory\n \n found here (especially ~20 pages of closely typed text from Goldstein’s snappily titled “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism”).\n
\n
\n •\tThe post-war\n \n Cold War\n \n fears are ancient history, and the rise of supposedly Islamic groups like Daesh/ISIS/ISIL pose a different sort of threat.\n
\n
\n BUT, where this is still pertinent, it’s not quite in the ways that Orwell might have expected.\n
\n
\n •\tWe’re blasé about\n \n ubiquitous CCTV\n \n cameras, and we voluntarily, enthusiastically, surrender details of our interests, activities, location, and friends via our smartphone apps, and Google (see Vox article about how Google Trends reveals the truths that people don\'t tell researchers,\n \n here\n \n ).\n
\n
\n •\tWe think we’re too smart to fall for lies like those of the Party, but a quick trawl of trending stories on social media demonstrates the untruth of that:\n \n people are gullible\n \n . The patent nonsense that people believe and share, without ever engaging the weakest of critical faculties is staggering. Most of those are trivial compared with the lies of Big Brother, but they show how easy it is to believe what everyone else believes, regardless of ample evidence to the contrary.\n
\n
\n •\tWe may not have Two Minutes’ Hate or Hate Week, but we certainly have hate figures, and again, social media exacerbates the crowd mentality: “\n \n The horrible thing… was not that one was obliged to act a part, but… that it was impossible to avoid joining in\n \n ”. I’ve not read Jon Ronson’s\n \n \n So You\'ve Been Publicly Shamed\n \n \n , but I’m familiar with many of the stories in it (if you’re not, look at the many excellent reviews on GR). Scary stuff.\n
\n
\n \n Update, January 2017, “Alternative Facts”\n \n
\n
\n On 20 January 2017, Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the USA. He campaigned in the style of an autocratic, narcissistic demagogue. He had a long track record of flagrantly denying obvious, provable truths, even on trivial matters. The day after numerous photos and other measures showed unimpressive attendance at his inauguration, rather than blame poor weather or practical and financial difficulties of travel, Sean Spicer, White House Press Secretary flat-out denied realistic estimates, refused to take questions, and threatened to crack down on the press. The resulting furore led to Kellyanne Conway, a Trump Strategist, defended him, saying he had merely presented\n \n "Alternative Facts"\n \n .\n
\n
\n “\n \n The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command… And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right. The obvious, the silly, and the true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet, objects unsupported fall towards the earth\'s centre. With the feeling that he was speaking to O\'Brien, and also that he was setting forth an important axiom, he wrote: .....Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.\n \n ”\n
\n
\n “\n \n If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say of this or that event, it never happened – that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death?\n \n ”\n
\n
\n “\n \n The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink\n \n .”\n
\n
\n “\n \n Being in a minority, even in a minority of one, did not make you mad. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.\n \n ”\n
\n
\n \n UnTruth and UnReality - Three Types\n \n
\n
\n •\t“The mutability of the past” means history is forever being\n\n rewritten\n\n corrected for slips, errors, misprints and misquotes, making truth unknowable (Winston is not even sure of his age or year of birth).\n
\n
\n •\tThe doublethink slogans of the Party are another deliberate type of unreality.\n
\n
\n •\tThe third confusion of reality is subtler, in stark contrast to the gritty realism of the rest of the book, and not one I’d really considered on previous readings. It relates to dreams, premonitions, hallucinations, and (in)sanity. Confusion from deprivation and torture is one thing, but there are possible magical-realist aspects. Early on, Winston dreams of meeting O’Brien “in the place where there is no darkness”; later mentions are ambiguous as to whether this is coincidence or something else. A country landscape is also familiar from a dream, and he has a muddled dream about the coral paperweight, his mother and a Jewish woman. Furthermore, there are times in prison when the interrogator’s knowledge seems too precise and secret to be inferred from spies, screens or microphones: can he read Winston’s mind?!\n
\n
\n “\n \n Reality exists in the human mind and nowhere else.\n \n ”\n
\n
\n \n “If there is hope, it lies in the proles”\n \n
\n
\n “\n \n The proles were not loyal to a party or a country or an idea, they were loyal to one another… The proles had stayed human.\n \n ” As unimportant drones, they have freedom denied to Party members and “were beneath suspicion”.\n
\n
\n Conditions in Airstrip One are dire, with food and basic services in very limited supply, but sanity is scarcest of all. “\n \n Stupidity was as necessary as intelligence, and as difficult to attain.\n \n ”\n
\n
\n For some, “\n \n By lack of understanding they remained sane\n \n ”.\n
\n
\n \n Three Parts\n \n
\n
\n •\tThe first part sets the scene of Winston’s Smith’s predictable life as an unimportant Party member in Big Brother’s terrifying regime in Airstrip One, ever at war with either Eurasia or Eastasia.\n
\n
\n •\tThe second part concerns actions: freedom, courage, love/lust, betrayal.\n
\n
\n •\tThe final part is about the consequences of those actions.\n
\n
\n Again and again, brief, apparently trivial things turn out to be significant.\n
\n
\n \n Newspeak\n \n
\n
\n “\n \n But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.\n \n ”\n
\n
\n “\n \n Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year\n \n ”, with the aim of making “\n \n thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it\n \n ”.\n
\n
\n This is really an extreme form of linguistic determinism (aka Sapir-Whorf hypothesis): the idea that the structure of a language can affect the cognition of those who use it. A very different extrapolation of that is in Ted Chiang\'s\n \n The Story of Your Life\n \n (filmed for 2016 as Arrival), reviewed\n \n HERE\n \n .\n
\n
\n I thought the linguistic aspect would be something I’d especially enjoy this time, but the key features are familiar and it’s explained in an appendix (which is where most of the lengthy extracts of Goldstein’s book should have gone, imo.) However, it\'s worth noting that the appendix, written after the main story, is in conventional English.\n \n Newspeak is/was no more\n \n .\n
\n
\n \n Feelings – and Troublesome Questions\n \n
\n
\n This is a grey, cold book. Even the lust and passion it contains is chilling. But it asks timeless and difficult questions about love and loyalty:\n
\n
\n •\tWould you risk everything - absolutely everything - for a few passionate meetings with someone you may not even love?\n
\n
\n •\tTo serve your ideology, would you lie, murder, steal… throw acid in a child’s face?\n
\n
\n •\tIf you could save your partner by doubling your own pain, would you? Would you really?\n
\n
\n •\tIs failure of love the only betrayal that counts? (If you tell all, but secretly love, are you loyal?)\n
\n
\n \n Quotes\n \n
\n
\n Some are so well-known, it might seem superfluous to type them here, but that’s exactly why I’ve included them.\n
\n
\n •\t“It was a bright cold day in April and the clocks were striking thirteen.”\n
\n •\t“Although the sun was shining and the sky a harsh blue, there seemed to be no colour in anything, except the posters that were plastered everywhere.”\n
\n •\t“An active man of almost paralysing stupidity.”\n
\n •\t“All history was a palimpsest.”\n
\n •\t“It was not by making yourself heard but by staying sane that you carried on the human heritage.”\n
\n •\t“The old man’s memory was nothing but a rubbish-heap of details.”\n
\n •\t“A hanging oil lamp which gave off an unclean but friendly smell.”\n
\n •\t“He would buy further scraps of beautiful rubbish.” (In addition to coral in glass.)\n
\n •\t“It was camouflage. If you kept the small rules, you could break the big ones.”\n
\n •\tA dash of lipstick and “she had become not only much prettier, but… far more feminine.”\n
\n •\tCharrington, the junk shop owner had “vaguely the air of being a collector rather than a tradesman”.\n
\n •\t“The end was contained in the beginning.”\n
\n •\t“Our only true life was in the future.”\n
\n •\t“Winston was gelatinous with fatigue… His body seemed to have not only the weakness of a jelly, but its transparency.”\n
\n •\t“The best books, he [Winston] perceived, are those that tell you what you know already.” No, no, no!\n
\n •\t“The blade would bite into him with a sort of burning coldness.”\n
\n •\t“Never, for any reason on earth, could you wish for an increase in pain… Nothing in the world was so bad as physical pain.” Hmm. What about emotional pain?\n
\n •\t“If you want to keep a secret you must also hide it from yourself.”\n
\n •\t“The confession was a formality. The torture was real.”\n
\n •\t“Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood.”\n
\n •\t“In the old days the heretic walked to the stake still a heretic… But we make the brain perfect before we blow it out.” Shades of Kafka’s\n \n In the Penal Colony\n \n , reviewed\n \n HERE\n \n .\n
\n
\n \n Slogans\n \n
\n
\n •\t“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”\n
\n •\t“Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”\n
\n •\t“2 + 2 = 5” “Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once.”\n
\n •\t“It is not enough to obey him: you must love him.”\n
\n •\t“We are interested solely in power… Power is not a means, it is an end.”\n
\n •\t“Outside man there is nothing… The earth is the centre of the universe.”\n
\n •\t“Big Brother is watching.”\n
\n
\n Image source:\n \n http://www.artsparx.com/images/bl_val...\n \n
\n
\n \n OLD Review from 2008\n \n
\n The year 1984 may be long passed, but this book is more pertinent than ever: big brother is watching us, history is rewritten (though that has always been true) and free speech is constrained (albeit often under the misused guise of political correctness).\n
\n
\n It\'s a shame that the humorous TV programme "Room 101" and reality TV franchise "Big Brother" have distracted people from the seriousness of Orwell\'s message.\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 106 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Mar 02, 2014\n \n \n \n Amira Mahmoud\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n translated\n \n ,\n \n أدب-روايات\n \n ,\n \n كتبي-المفضلة\n \n ,\n \n مراجعاتي-المفضلة\n \n\n\n \n \n 2+2=5\n\n
\n وعليك اعتباراها حقيقة مُسلم بها\n
\n كيف؟\n
\n والمنطق والفكر والمعادلات والدلائل والتاريخ ...إلخ، ليس لها قيمة إذن\n
\n \n فالجهل هو القوة\n \n
\n وأين حريتك في التفكير والرأي!\n
\n \n الحرية هي العبودية\n \n
\n أسوء أنواع القمع، هي تلك التي تُمارس على العقل والتفكير\n
\n \n أنت لا تملك سوى تلك السنتيميترات المربعة في جمجمتك\n \n
\n لكن حتى تلك، تنوء بِحملها\n
\n وملكيتها تُشكل لك خوف ورهبة من أن يظهر ما تُفكر فيه في انفعالاتك\n
\n أو على صفحة وجهك أو لغة جسدك\n
\n أو حتى أن ينطبع لديك في اللاوعي\n
\n فيُصبح أخشى ما تخشاه أن تهلوس به أثناء نومك\n
\n قمع فكري، وعملية غسيل للمخ و\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2+2=5\n
\n وعليك اعتباراها حقيقة مُسلم بها\n
\n كيف؟\n
\n والمنطق والفكر والمعادلات والدلائل والتاريخ ...إلخ، ليس لها قيمة إذن\n
\n \n فالجهل هو القوة\n \n
\n وأين حريتك في التفكير والرأي!\n
\n \n الحرية هي العبودية\n \n
\n أسوء أنواع القمع، هي تلك التي تُمارس على العقل والتفكير\n
\n \n أنت لا تملك سوى تلك السنتيميترات المربعة في جمجمتك\n \n
\n لكن حتى تلك، تنوء بِحملها\n
\n وملكيتها تُشكل لك خوف ورهبة من أن يظهر ما تُفكر فيه في انفعالاتك\n
\n أو على صفحة وجهك أو لغة جسدك\n
\n أو حتى أن ينطبع لديك في اللاوعي\n
\n فيُصبح أخشى ما تخشاه أن تهلوس به أثناء نومك\n
\n قمع فكري، وعملية غسيل للمخ وإعادة صياغته\n
\n للدرجة التي توصلك للتشكك في قواك العقلية\n
\n أأنت المجنون أم ما يحدث من حولك هو هذيان لا أكثر؟\n
\n
\n أكثر الأعمال التي تُبهرني، هي تلك التي تعبث بعقلك\n
\n وتغير تفكيرك\n
\n تلك التي من المستحيل أن تقرأها ويبقى تفكيرك كما كان قبل قراءتها\n
\n تلك التي تصوّر فظاعة الواقع، تجرده وتعريه\n
\n وتكشف الحقيقة التي نتغاضى عنها، ونتجنبها\n
\n الرواية على الرغم من بعض الملل الذي يتخللها\n
\n إلا أن فكرتها تُجبرك على استكمالها\n
\n الجزء الأخير منها كارثي وصادم!\n
\n
\n أعُجبت بفكرة كتاب غولدشتاين\n
\n تلك الحيلة التي أستخدمها أورويل\n
\n ليُوضح مقصده وفكرته بتفصيل أكبر\n
\n لنُصدم بالحقيقة أكثر\n
\n
\n \n من يملك الماضي يملك المستقبل، من يملك الحاضر يملك الماضي\n \n
\n ووطن بماضي مُزيف، هو وطن لا مستقبل له\n
\n اسأل الله ألا يُفقدنا ماضينا، ذاك الشيء الوحيد الذي بقى لنا للتباهي به\n
\n
\n هي كما قيل\n
\n \n رواية تُقرأ ثم تُقرأ من جديد\n \n
\n
\n تمّت\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 80 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n May 02, 2015\n \n \n \n Zoë\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n Goodness gracious this was very unsettling. I\'m already a pretty paranoid person, so the idea of Big Brother was both very intriguing but also extremely frightening.\n\n
\n I really enjoyed reading this, but there were moments when I wasn\'t invested in the story and wanted to take a break from it, mostly in the last half of the book. Still DEFINITELY worth the read, though!\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 5 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Christy Foss\n \n \n Ian, I was thinking exactly the same thing. We have sheepishly allowed ourselves to be controlled by B.B. We are addicted to what society tells us we\n \n \n Ian, I was thinking exactly the same thing. We have sheepishly allowed ourselves to be controlled by B.B. We are addicted to what society tells us we must. We spend our days with our faces glued to our cell phones and we have not a moment of privacy because they go everywhere we go. The whole “I mentioned xyz in conversation and then xyz showed up on my Facebook feed” thing should be enough to alarm us and wake us up to the realization that we have given B.B. and whoever else possesses the technology/ability complete access to our lives. It’s frightening how accurate 1984 is, if not in exact details, but in the methods and the thought control. (I apologize if my comment isn’t fully coherent, it’s late and I’m exhausted from finishing this book)!\n \n \n ...more\n \n\n
\n \n Jan 01, 2018 10:50PM\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Kinga\n \n \n I know exactly what you mean. Personally I am someone who enjoys a good conspiracy theory binge from time to time but wow. This book put me on the edg\n \n \n I know exactly what you mean. Personally I am someone who enjoys a good conspiracy theory binge from time to time but wow. This book put me on the edge of my seats and made me tape the camera on my laptop. If I am being completely honest I think we all knew how to book was going to end but the grafic description of a decaying personality truly shocked me. I am curious, was there any part in the book where you had to put it down? For me, towards the end was extremely stressful to read so I kept on putting it down. Once I finally finished I lost all hope in our current society for a solid couple of days. I believe that that is what makes a piece of art truly intriguing, when it undeniable forces the reader to have an emotional reaction to. As my last few words I would also touch on the inspiration that this book might give some.\n\n
\n
\n Ps.: We are the dead.\n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n
\n \n Sep 30, 2018 08:48PM\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Aug 02, 2011\n \n \n \n Lyn\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n “It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.”\n\n
\n
\n This changed the way that I looked at ideologies and changed the way I looked at leadership. Cynical, scathing, and not without its flaws, this is still a stark, haunting glimpse at what could be.\n
\n
\n “War is peace.\n
\n Freedom is slavery.\n
\n Ignorance is strength.”\n
\n
\n Chilling.\n
\n
\n The closing lines still come to me sometimes and remind me of depths that I can only imagine.\n
\n
\n “He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to\n \n \n “It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.”\n
\n
\n This changed the way that I looked at ideologies and changed the way I looked at leadership. Cynical, scathing, and not without its flaws, this is still a stark, haunting glimpse at what could be.\n
\n
\n “War is peace.\n
\n Freedom is slavery.\n
\n Ignorance is strength.”\n
\n
\n Chilling.\n
\n
\n The closing lines still come to me sometimes and remind me of depths that I can only imagine.\n
\n
\n “He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself.\n
\n
\n He loved Big Brother”\n
\n
\n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 26 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jan 13, 2017\n \n \n \n Joe Valdez\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n sci-fi-general\n \n\n\n \n \n My preparedness for the regime change taking place in the United States--with elements of the Electoral College, the Kremlin and the FBI helping to install a failed business promoter who the majority of American voters did not support in the election--begins with\n \n 1984\n \n by George Orwell. Like many, this 1949 novel was assigned reading for me in high school. What stood out to me then was that I needed to finish it because there would be a test. Studying how civics is supposed to work in 3rd period\n \n \n My preparedness for the regime change taking place in the United States--with elements of the Electoral College, the Kremlin and the FBI helping to install a failed business promoter who the majority of American voters did not support in the election--begins with\n \n 1984\n \n by George Orwell. Like many, this 1949 novel was assigned reading for me in high school. What stood out to me then was that I needed to finish it because there would be a test. Studying how civics is supposed to work in 3rd period government did not prepare me in 7th period English for this harrowing and precise depiction of fear and hatred run amok.\n\n
\n
\n \n 1990 Joe\n \n
\n
\n We\'re in the future! At least, what George Orwell thought postwar England might be like in in the future. Great Britain is now governed by Oceania and resembles a Warsaw Pact nation--the Party controls every action and thought of its miserable population through propaganda, surveillance and torture--but what\'s happened is that an atomic war in the 1950s left survivors in the United States and Western Europe desperate for law and order. Party members who pledge absolute loyalty to a figure known as Big Brother have their essential needs provided for, while the lower caste are known as Proles and regarded as rubbish. It sucks here!\n
\n
\n \n 2016 Joe\n \n
\n
\n Winston Smith is a contemplative thirty-nine year old Outer Party member who works at the Ministry of Truth in London. Like many great literary characters, he does not feel well. Winston is employed in the Records Department, altering (or as it\'s officially known, rectifying) articles for The Times which no longer adhere to the reality of The Party. Winston suffers from an ulcer on his leg and like many, subsists on Victory Gin. He leaves work on his lunch break to return his flat in Victory Gardens, hiding in a nook where he believes the telescreen installed in his home cannot see him. He begins a handwritten diary in an old book, with paper, that he found in a junk shop.\n
\n
\n \n For a moment he was seized by a kind of hysteria. He began writing in a hurried untidy scrawl:\n \n
\n
\n theyll shoot me i don’t care theyll shoot me in the back of the neck i dont care down with big brother they always shoot you in the back of the neck i dont care down with big brother--\n
\n
\n \n He sat back in his chair, slightly ashamed of himself, and laid down the pen. The next moment he started violently. There was a knocking at the door.\n \n
\n
\n \n 1990 Joe\n \n
\n
\n Whoa so there\'s some heavy stuff in this book, like, telescreens that scream at you to do calisthenics in the morning, shout propaganda at you in the afternoon and listen to you talking in your sleep at night. There are periodic shortages of essential goods like razor blades and a perpetual war with Oceania\'s foe, Eurasia. At least the Party says so. No one trusts anyone else. In addition to hidden microphones, there are informers and spies everywhere prepared to turn you in to the Thought Police for thought crimes. Children most of all revel in ratting out their Outer Party moms and dads.\n
\n
\n \n It was always at night — the arrests invariably happened at night. The sudden jerk out of sleep, the rough hand shaking your shoulder, the lights glaring in your eyes, the ring of hard faces round the bed. In the vast majority of cases there was no trial, no report of the arrest. People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: VAPORIZED was the usual word.\n \n
\n
\n \n 2016 Joe\n \n
\n
\n The Party has so eradicated records of the past and traumatized its Outer Party members into obedience that its slogans are: WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH. But Winston\'s mind is his own. He\'s old enough to keep a mental inventory of the inconsistencies of the Party--like the one that says they invented aeroplanes--and contemplate that the glance of a co-worker named O\'Brien reveals a fellow rebel. Believing that the only hope to overthrow Big Brother lies with the proles, Winston ventures into the slums. He buys an old man a pint and grills him for information on the past. Everyone seems blind, except, to Winston\'s terror, a dark-haired woman he works with at the Ministry of Truth. She sees Winston in the slums.\n
\n
\n \n 1990 Joe\n \n
\n
\n This book is hard to enjoy. Just when things start to slow, there is a love story introduced between Winston and his co-worker, Julia. She works at the Fiction Department, operating the press (that\'s kinda hot) that cranks out the only books that are allowed in Oceania. Winston initially suspects her of being a typical frigid Party femmebot, but Julia slips him a love note and arranges a series meetings with the aplomb of a spy. Separated in age by about fifteen years, I never understood what Julia\'s attraction to Winston was or why the couple didn\'t band together to escape or to take down Big Brother. If I was Winston, I\'d stab Inner Party members all day without a lunch break.\n
\n
\n \n 2016 Joe\n \n
\n
\n George Orwell\'s writing is so precise, so penetrative, that I felt like he was broadcasting truths into my mind with a laser. I could appreciate that Winston and Julia were doing what they had to survive, that staying alive another day, even under tyranny, had become paramount to all other concerns. As an adult, I can now appreciate how fear and hatred warp democracy and how people who feel they have nothing left to lose surrender their once cherished freedoms and throw their lot in with a Big Brother who promises to take care of them. And did I mention the writing?\n
\n
\n \n ‘You are very young,’ he said. ‘You are ten or fifteen years younger than I am. What could you see to attract you in a man like me?’\n
\n
\n ‘It was something in your face. I thought I’d take a chance. I’m good at spotting people who don’t belong. As soon as I saw you I knew you were against THEM.’\n
\n
\n THEM, it appeared, meant the Party, and above all the Inner Party, about whom she talked with an open jeering hatred which made Winston feel uneasy, although he knew that they were safe here if they could be safe anywhere. A thing that astonished him about her was the coarseness of her language. Party members were supposed not to swear, and Winston himself very seldom did swear, aloud, at any rate. Julia, however, seemed unable to mention the Party, and especially the Inner Party, without using the kind of words that you saw chalked up in dripping alley-ways. He did not dislike it. It was merely one symptom of her revolt against the Party and all its ways, and somehow it seemed natural and healthy, like the sneeze of a horse that smells bad hay.\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n The devil is in the details. What stands out to me in\n \n 1984\n \n is precision with which Orwell depicts the joys of humanity thriving under inhumane rule as well as the terror of being exposed. Thinking men like Winston know that they\'ll be arrested, tortured and possibly vaporized for allowing themselves the indulgences that they do, but no amount of reason can prepare them for that moment of betrayal, arrest and interrogation. The third act of\n \n 1984\n \n is terrifying. The Party\'s true methodology--to convert political prisoners to embrace Big Brother before disposing of them--is chilling, something whose force I wasn\'t prepared to appreciate in high school.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 60 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n May 27, 2010\n \n \n \n Nawal Al-Qussyer\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n it was amazing\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n changed-the-way-i-see-the-world\n \n\n\n \n \n أضفت مراجعة الرواية في مدونتي ضمن 50 كتاب غيرني\n\n
\n \n http://www.nawalsaad.com/?p=4108\n \n
\n وأضفت رابط لتقرير رحالة قام بزيارة كوريا الشمالية، وكان صادمًا تطابق استراتيجات الرواية مع ما يفعل في كوريا الشمالية.\n
\n
\n المجد للكتب التي تحدث ضجة داخل عقلك.. المجد للكتب التي تحفز اليقطة الذهنية فيك .. المجد للكتاب الذي يصفعك ويجعلك تعيد النظر في أشياء كثيرة .. هذا الكتاب من الكتب النادرة التي توازي شهرتها وضجتها قيمتها الفكرية والروائية ..\n
\n
\n قرأت الكتاب في الطائرة رحلة عودة من امستردام إلى الرياض .. استغرق معي الكتاب 6 ساع\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n أضفت مراجعة الرواية في مدونتي ضمن 50 كتاب غيرني\n
\n \n http://www.nawalsaad.com/?p=4108\n \n
\n وأضفت رابط لتقرير رحالة قام بزيارة كوريا الشمالية، وكان صادمًا تطابق استراتيجات الرواية مع ما يفعل في كوريا الشمالية.\n
\n
\n المجد للكتب التي تحدث ضجة داخل عقلك.. المجد للكتب التي تحفز اليقطة الذهنية فيك .. المجد للكتاب الذي يصفعك ويجعلك تعيد النظر في أشياء كثيرة .. هذا الكتاب من الكتب النادرة التي توازي شهرتها وضجتها قيمتها الفكرية والروائية ..\n
\n
\n قرأت الكتاب في الطائرة رحلة عودة من امستردام إلى الرياض .. استغرق معي الكتاب 6 ساعات ونصف لم أشعر بالاقلاع ولم أشعر بأي مطبات هوائية حينها وأنا التي تربكني تحركات الطائرة واهتزازاتها ..\n
\n تعرف تماما الكتاب النخبوي حين يحرض حاسة البحث لديك ويجعلك تبحث عن كتب أخرى تتحدث عن ذات الموضوع .. تعرف جودة الكتاب حين تظل تبحث عن كاتبه وخلفيته ونشأته ساعات طويلة ..\n
\n هذا ما كنت أفعله عندما أنهيته وحتى يومي هذا .. ابتعت كتب تتحدث عن صناعة العدو ، والقدرة على الثورات وعلم النفس السياسي .. ولربما لو لم أقرأ هذا الكتاب ( وقبله كتب أخرى ) لن يحرضني غيرها للاهتمام بهذه الكتب ..\n
\n
\n على الرغم من قراءاتي السابقة في فلسفة الاستبداد ، و حكومات القمع والاستبداد وما يمكن أن تفعله حتى تضمن بقاؤها واستمراها ، إلا أن هذا الكتاب صدمة لي .. لكنها صدمة تحثك على زيادة الوعي لديك وتقسم خمسين ألف مرة أنك لن تدع وعيك يموت ولن يدمره شيء !\n
\n
\n يقدم جورج سياسات القمع والديكتاتورية بقالب درامي رمزي رفيع جدا ، حتى وإن قلت لوهلة هذا مبالغ به جدا ! دقيقتين من التفكير وستجد أن الاستراتيجية حدثت من قبل أو تحدث الآن لكن يختلف تلقينا لها واهتمامنا لها ..\n
\n إنه لعمل عظيم أن تدرس الحاضر والماضي وتعير أدنى التفاصيل انتباهك، ثم بعد ذلك تستشرف المستقبل .. مرعب والله مرعب كمية الوقائع حاليا التي تشبه تنبؤات جورج ، تغير القوى ، تغيير العدو في يوم وليلة الخ ..\n
\n
\n لدى حكومات القمع طرق سحرية حتى تقنعك بما يرفضه عقلك ابتداء، عليك أن تقتنع ب:\n
\n
\n الحرب هي السلام\n
\n الحرية هي العبودية\n
\n الجهل هو القوة\n
\n 2+2=5\n
\n
\n وفي بعض المرات ممكن يساوي ثلاثة أو أربعة .. 2+2 يساوي العدد الذي تخبرك به حكومة القمع ..\n
\n التاريخ يتغير حسب ما تريده الحكومات ، حسب ما تريدك أن تصدقه .. إنها حكومات تعمل على تسطيح عقولنا والهاءنا في ما لاينفع حتى تستمر هذه الحكومات بالتلاعب بالعالم ..\n
\n وبنظرة سريعة للعالم وما يجري الآن تدرك أن معظم الحكومات هي حكومات قمع داخليا وخارجيا ، هناك فقط مستويات مختلفة ، وطرق مختلفة لتحقيق هذا القمع ..\n
\n
\n فقدت الثقة بمعظم ما كُتب في التاريخ، فكلّا يكتب مايريده .. كلّا يكذب بما يتلائم مع مصلحته .. من الممكن جدا أن تقنع شعبك أن أسلافهم كانوا يعبدون القدور والأصنام، لكن تم انقاذك من هذا الوحل .. بينما الواقع يكون شيئا آخر !!\n
\n اقرأ التاريخ من ألف مصدر ان استطعت .. وفوق كل هذا فالتحريف والسهو وارد جدا ..\n
\n
\n الاستبداد يفقدك متع الحياة كلها ، لن تعيش كما ينبغي أن تعيش .. ستكون كما الآلة تتزوج وتنجب من أجل الواجب والحزب .. تأكل من أجل الحزب .. شاشة الرصد تحيطك يمنة ويسرة .. لا تكتب ولا تقرأ كما تريد ..\n
\n لوحات بصورة الأخ الكبير تواجهك في كل مكان حتى تنغرس في عقلك بأنه لامحالة من أن تعيش .. الأسهل أن تخضع ، أن تتأقلم وتعيش بالكفاف ..\n
\n الأخ الكبير يراقبك .. التبجيل في أعظم صوره .. نشر صور القادة بطريقة مبالغ بها وكبيرة ، وعبارات مدح وتبجيل لا يمكنها إلا أن تفسد كل ما في عقلك للأسف إن لم ننتبه لهذا .. كل هذه الاستراتيجيات لعبة سياسية قذرة .. لعبة نفسية مدروسة ..\n
\n
\n ثلاث قوى استبدادية تتصارع حول بقية العالم ، من يظفر بمن ؟ وكيف بإمكانك إخضاع شعب لأي فكرة تأتي بها ؟ كيف يمكنك تطوير أسلحة ذهنية لدمار شامل للعقل .. كيف يمكنك تدليس الحقيقة، وجعل كل شيء صحيحا أو خاطئا كيفما تريد ومتى تريد .. كيف يمكنك زرع الكره تجاه ماضي أو حاضر أو مستقبل .. كيف يكون بإمكان القوى القوية أن تتنازع حول أراضي وقوة ليست من حقها ، إنه استبداد الانسان على الإنسان ، استبداد الإنسان على نفسه ..\n
\n
\n
\n
\n - أوبراين : "كيف يؤكد الانسان سلطته على انسان آخر يا ونستون؟"\n
\n
\n - ونستون: - "بجعله يقاسي الألم".\n
\n
\n اوبراين: - " "أصبت فيما تقول. بتعريضه للألم، فالطاعة وحدها ليست كافية، وما لم يعاني الانسان من الألم كيف يمكنك أن تتحقق من أنه ينصاع لإرادتك لا لإرادته هو؟ إن السلطة هي إذلاله وإنزال الألم به، وهي أيضاً تمزيق العقول البشرية إلى أشلاء ثم جمعها وصياغتها في قوالب جديدة من اختيارنا.\n
\n هل تفهم أي نوع من العالم نقوم بخلقه الآن؟ إنه النقيض التام ليوتوبيا المدينة الفاضلة التي تصورها المصلحون الأقدمون، إنه عالم الخوف والغدر والتعذيب، عالم يدوس الناس فيه بعضهم بعضاً، عالم يزداد قسوة كلما ازداد نقاء، إذ التقدم في عالمنا هو التقدم باتجاه مزيد من الألم. لقد زعمت الحضارات الغابرة بأنها قامت على الحب والعدالة أما حضارتنا فهي قائمة على الكراهية، ففي عالمنا لا مكان لعواطف غير الخوف والغضب والانتشاء بالنصر وإذلال الذات، وأي شيء خلاف ذلك سندمره تدميراً. إننا بالفعل نعمل على تفكيك العادات الفكرية التي ورثناها من العهد السابق للثورة، لقد فصمنا عرى العلاقة بين الطفل ووالديه، وبين الصديق وصديقه، وبين الزوج وزوجته، ولم يعد أحد قادراً على الثقة بزوجته أو بطفله أو بصديقه، وفي المستقبل لن يكون هناك زوجات أو أصدقاء. كما سينعدم كل ولاء ليس للحزب ، وسيباد كل حب ليس للأخ الكبير. ولن يكون هناك ضحك غير الضحك الذي يصاحب نشوة الانتصار على العدو المقهور، ولن يكون هنالك أدب أو فن أو علم، فحينما تجتمع في أيدينا كل أسباب القوة لن تكون بنا حاجة إلى العلم. كما ستزول الفروق بين الجمال والقبح، ولن يكون هناك حب للاستطلاع أو التمتع بالحياة ولن يكون هناك ميل نحو مباهج الحياة التي ستدمر تدميراً......"\n
\n
\n كيف يمكنك أن تشغل العامة بالرذيلة باختلاف أشكالها ، بالفوضى الصغيرة حتى لا يعودو قادرين على معرفة الفوضى الكبيرة .. كيف تأكل أنت جيدا وشعبك لا يعرف طعم الأشياء الحقيقي .. عليه فقط أن يصدق كل ماتقول ..\n
\n حياتك كنفس غير مهمة لسلطات القمع، حياتك فكريا وانسانيا هي ما يقلقهم ، هي ما يجعلهم يصلون إليك ويخفونك من الوجود الواعي ، يتنزعون منك إنسانيتك .. يسخرون كل القوى والتقنيات والاستراتيجيات من أجل ذلك الهدف ، من أجل أن ينجحو في الأخير لتقول :\n
\n لا بأس فقد انتهى النضال، وها قد انتصرت على نفسي وصرت أحب الأخ الكبير.\n
\n
\n
\n لا يكفي حكومات القمع والاستبداد أن تكفر بما يكفرون به، بل يجب أن تؤمن بالأخ الكبير ، طاعة عمياء وتصديق لكل مايقوله عن ظهر قلب .. بدو شك .. بدون تفكير .. آمن من قلبك به وبكل مايقوله ..\n
\n
\n
\n مؤلمة الرواية لأن نهايتها مؤلمة ومؤسف أنها تحدث حاليا، ونرى ما يشبه أحداثها ، مؤلمة لكن الحرب ماتزال قائة الى يوم الدين مع كل مايعطل العقل البشري ويقيد حريته ، قائمة حتى يأتي جيل يرفض هذا العنت السياسي وتزدهر الانسانية .. فتلك الأيام نداولها بين الناس ..\n
\n
\n
\n شخصيا أرى أن الرواية لا تقتصر فقط على السياسة ، فهي بلا شك يمكن إسقاطها على أبسط الأمور مع تجاوز العديد من الدراما فيها ..\n
\n
\n الناحية الأدبية كانت جميلة ومقبولة في الرواية على الرغم من قلة معرفتي بالنقد الأدبي ، لكن أرى أن الرواية مباشرة أكثر من اللازم .. ربما كان لجورج مغزى من ذلك فهو كان ينشر لبشر وعيهم يختلف عن وعينا، ومستوى تلقيهم يختلف ؟\n
\n
\n
\n أرجو أن لاتفهم من تقييمي بخمسة نجوم بأن الراوية لا يوجد بها ضعف أو ملاحظات ، ولكني في مثل هذه الكتب أقيم بشكل عام مع ذكر الملاحظات ، وعلى الرغم من أن الرواية كمفهوم ليست جديدة كليا إلا أنها كتب في وقت قديم جدا وهذا ما يضفي عليها الكثير من الجمال الفكري ، كمقدمة ابن خلدون .. فمن العدل في نظري أن تقيم حسب وقت نشرها ، فهي كانت من القواعد لكثير من أعمال نشرت وصورت بعدها ..\n
\n
\n هل تستحق القراءة ؟ نعم تستحق من وجهة نظري .. حتى ولو سبقت لك القراءة في حكومات القمع وغيرها فمن الجيد معرفة أحد الأساسات لمثل هذه الكتابات .. أيضا أجد أنها تساعد كثيرا لفهم وتحليل الواقع والمستقبل ..\n
\n فمنذ أن قرأتها لم أتوقف عن الحديث عنها لزوجي ، وفي كل موقف أضرب له مثلا بما جاء في الرواية حتى رغب بشدة في قراءتها ..\n
\n رواية بامتياز تستحق أن تقتنيها و تكون في رفوف مكتبتك بشكل دائم ..\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 11 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n Jul 05, 2014\n \n \n \n Antonio\n \n \n rated it\n \n \n really liked it\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ·\n \n \n review of another edition\n \n\n\n \n Recommends it for:\n \n \n Todos\n \n\n\n Shelves:\n \n clásicos\n \n ,\n \n ciencia-ficción\n \n ,\n \n horror-terror\n \n ,\n \n favorites\n \n\n\n \n \n Este libro me sigue atormentando...\n\n
\n
\n Antes de hablar de la historia, primero quiero hablar un poco sobre géneros literarios, si yo se debería enfocarme en el libro pero denme un momento, nunca he sido fanático del género del terror, por dos razones: asustarse para divertirse no me parece muy lógico, y la otra razón es que siempre hay una vocecita en mi cabeza que, cuando se trata de monstruos, fantasmas, demonios, vampiros, posesiones, etc. me dice esto no es real, como te vas a asustar de lo que\n \n \n Este libro me sigue atormentando...\n
\n
\n Antes de hablar de la historia, primero quiero hablar un poco sobre géneros literarios, si yo se debería enfocarme en el libro pero denme un momento, nunca he sido fanático del género del terror, por dos razones: asustarse para divertirse no me parece muy lógico, y la otra razón es que siempre hay una vocecita en mi cabeza que, cuando se trata de monstruos, fantasmas, demonios, vampiros, posesiones, etc. me dice esto no es real, como te vas a asustar de lo que no existe ni existirá, y termino haciéndole caso, entonces me encuentro con este libro, que según GOODREADS me dice es un clásico, de ciencia ficción distópico, - y una mierda –\n \n este libro es de terror\n \n , este es el libro que me mantiene despierto en las noches, pensativo y con miedo porque todo lo que dice es casi (un insignificante casi) real.\n
\n
\n Ahora si la reseña la dividiré en tres partes, porque el libro está dividido en tres partes a su vez, así que será algo larga, espero la leas, sino me conformo con que hayas leído el párrafo de arriba, en la tercera parte incluiré spoiler, así que si no han leído el libro recomiendo leer solo hasta la segunda parte.\n
\n
\n \n Primera parte:\n \n Conocemos a nuestro personaje principal Winston Smith y el nos ira describiendo que tan jodido esta su mundo.\n
\n\n \n Era un día luminoso y frío de abril y los relojes daban las trece.\n \n\n
\n El mundo está dividido en tres grandes potencias en guerra, Winston pertenece a Oceania, la cual esta comandada por el partido\n \n INGSOC\n \n y su líder es el\n \n Gran Hermano\n \n , uno de los lemas del partido es\n \n \n “El gran hermano siempre te vigila”\n \n \n y esto, lamentablemente es verdad, ya que en todas partes hay unas maquinas llamadas\n \n telepantallas\n \n , que se encargan de emitir publicidad para el gobierno, todos los logros de este, y por supuesto también mensajes de a quién debe odiar la población, esto es llevado al extremo en un acto, los "dos minutos de odio", donde toda la población se reúne a declararle su odio a los enemigos del partido. Pero las telepantallas no solo sirven para eso, las telepantallas vigilan, graban todo lo que sucede a su alrededor, para que, la población no pueda cometer ningún crimen sin que se sepa, y aquel que cometa un crimen, como hablar en contra del Gran hermano o del partido,\n \n “desaparecerá”\n \n , esto tendrá más sentido si conocemos en que trabaja Winston.\n
\n\n \n «El que controla el pasado —decía el slogan del Partido—, controla también el futuro.El que controla el presente, controla el pasado.»\n \n\n
\n Winston trabaja en el\n \n Ministerio de la verdad\n \n , que irónicamente, o\n \n doblepensando\n \n , se encarga de acomodar el pasado, cambiarlo al antojo y necesidad del partido, Winston se da cuenta por ejemplo de que Oceanía aunque siempre está en guerra, no siempre está en guerra con la misma potencia, a veces esta aliada con una de las potencias y peleada con la otra, pero estas posiciones suelen invertirse, entonces el ministerio de la verdad acomoda todo el pasado a su conveniencia, modificando todo periódico, libro o revista, para que digan que siempre se ha estado en guerra con digamos Eurasia.\n
\n
\n Además de esto, cuando se encuentra un criminal que sea perteneciente al partido, todo su pasado es cambiado para decir que dicho criminal siempre fue malo y tuvo intenciones en contra del partido o\n \n “desaparece”\n \n , cuando una persona desaparece, no es que solamente ha dejado de vivir, no, se elimina todo información que haya sobre la persona, virtualmente nunca existió. Esta primera parte es un monologo casi ininterrumpido de Winston donde nos muestra su desacuerdo con la situación y sus intenciones de formar parte de la rebelión.\n
\n \n Segunda Parte.\n \n
\n\n \n LA GUERRA ES LA PAZ\n\n
\n
\n LA LIBERTAD ES LA ESCLAVITUD\n
\n
\n LA IGNORANCIA ES LA FUERZA\n \n
\n
\n En esta parte cambia un poco el tono de la historia, Winston conoce a una chica llamada\n \n Julia\n \n , de la cual se enamora, ella también está en contra del partido, pero quizás con menos fervor que Winston, empiezan a reunirse en sitios clandestinos y a protestar a su manera en contra del partido, teniendo relaciones, cosa que, si se disfruta, en este mundo también es un crimen. Winston conoce a otro personaje acá,\n \n O’Brien\n \n un hombre que solo con verlo le inspira admiración y confianza, y que él cree forma parte de la Rebelión. Cosa que se confirma más adelante.\n
\n
\n Winston y Julia logran reunirse con O’Brien y este los introduce a la rebelión y le entregara un libro a Winston donde se explica todo el movimiento y todas las razones de porque el mundo está en las condiciones en que esta.\n
\n
\n Debo decir que esta fue mi parte favorita del libro, hay tanta\n \n filosofía política\n \n , tantas explicaciones que incluso siendo parte de esta historia se aplican perfectamente a nuestro mundo, entenderemos ese otro lema del partido LA GUERRA ES LA PAZ / LA LIBERTAD ES LA ESCLAVITUD/ LA IGNORANCIA ES LA FUERZA, todo está explicado tan clara y perfectamente que me hace pensar que el escritor\n \n \n George Orwell era un genio\n \n \n , subraye muchos párrafos y frases de esta parte, pero creo que es conveniente que ustedes los lean personalmente junto a la historia.\n
\n
\n \n Tercera parte: léase bajo su propio riesgo, de acá para abajo vienen los spoilers\n \n
\n
\n Winston y Julia son capturados, la verdad no duraron mucho como espías, pero resulta que O’Brien no era de la Rebelión sino del partido.\n
\n
\n Winton es separado de Julia y empieza la tortura física y mental por parte de O’Brien, verán O’Brien no quiere matar a Winston, no, no eso sería muy sencillo, el lo quiero destruir psicológicamente, hacer que ame al gran hermano y al partido, que todo pensamiento que ha tenido en contra de ellos sea admitido como erróneo por parte de Winston y que nunca vuelva a pensar en contra de ellos.\n
\n
\n \n Esta es la parte más cruel del libro,\n \n odie a O’Brien es un sociópata, sicótico con el poder de hacer mucho daño a Winston y a todos en general, el representa al partido, EL es el partido o ¿debería decir todo es el partido?.\n
\n
\n \n El final\n \n , aquí llegamos te felicito y agradezco si has leído lo que escrito hasta este momento,\n
\n
\n El final es lo más triste y la razón por la cual le baje una estrella al libro, Winston es sometido, Winston pierde su persona y llega a amar al Gran Hermano\n
\n
\n \n
\n
\n En este momento la voz de George Orwell (que suena extrañamente similar a la de su tocayo George R. R. Martin) dice en mi cabeza, “\n \n si creías que habría un final feliz era que no estabas prestando atención\n \n ”\n
\n
\n No, no creía que el final fuera feliz, ya había aceptado lo contrario, pero tonto, inocente de mi pensé que Winston haría algo, que la humanidad prevalecería, que de alguna manera ante toda esta catastrófica situación algo, aunque fuera mínimo, se podría hacer.\n
\n
\n Winston no tiene importancia en la historia, su única función es ser narrador, pero no cambia nada, no hace nada, el mundo queda igual de jodido que como nos presentan al principio. Esto me aterra, me atemoriza, me niego a aceptarlo, si pierdo la fe en la humanidad (aun en la humanidad ficticia de un mundo cuasi ficticio) no podre dormir jamás.\n
\n
\n \n Este es un libro que todo el mundo debería leer, y reflexionar sobre él, una vez mas lo recomiendo mucho.\n \n
\n \n \n ...more\n \n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n View all 46 comments\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Likitha\n \n \n Tom Corson-Knowles, the author who founded Bestseller Ranking Pro, spent six long years trying to get a traditional publishing deal (and failed misera\n \n \n Tom Corson-Knowles, the author who founded Bestseller Ranking Pro, spent six long years trying to get a traditional publishing deal (and failed miserably). He finally decided to self publish his first book on Kindle in February, 2012.\n\n
\n
\n That one decision changed his life (and the lives of the more than 30,000 authors he\'s since taught how to write, publish and market their books professionally).\n
\n
\n Just twelve months after self publishing his first book, Tom had his first $12,000+ month from Kindle ebook royalties alone.\n
\n
\n In Bestseller Ranking Pro, Tom will share with you his step-by-step system for becoming a bestselling author.\n
\n
\n These strategies have also helped Tom and his private publishing clients create more than sixty-seven #1 Amazon bestselling books and counting.\n
\n
\n If you\'re going to write, publish or promote a book this year, you need to see this:\n
\n
\n \n https://bestsellerrankingpro.com?vhbs...\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n
\n \n Jul 03, 2018 01:32AM\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n Francisco Tavie\n \n \n Me entretiene el 50% del libro, sin embargo al final te hace reflexionar sobre la libertad y la metafísica de nuestra realidad que "compensa" y hace d\n \n \n Me entretiene el 50% del libro, sin embargo al final te hace reflexionar sobre la libertad y la metafísica de nuestra realidad que "compensa" y hace de este libro un libro recomendable.\n \n \n ...more\n \n\n
\n \n Sep 29, 2018 04:01PM\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n \n new topic\n \n\n \n Discuss This Book\n \n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n \n\n topics\n \n\n posts\n \n\n views\n \n\n last activity\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n Great American Re...:\n \n \n \n September 2018—1984 by George Orwell\n \n \n\n 40\n \n\n 20\n \n\n 5 hours, 55 min ago\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n UCAS English 11 R...:\n \n \n \n September Reading Assignment\n \n \n\n 1\n \n\n 5\n \n\n Sep 30, 2018 06:59PM\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n Fantasy Buddy Reads:\n \n \n \n 1984 [October 22, 2018]\n \n \n\n 5\n \n\n 21\n \n\n Sep 29, 2018 12:28PM\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n what would happen to you if you were in 101 room\n \n \n\n 34\n \n\n 350\n \n\n Sep 29, 2018 04:58AM\n \n\n \n\n \n More topics...\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n Readers Also Enjoyed\n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n- \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n Videos About This Book\n \n
\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n More videos...\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n About George Orwell\n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n George Orwell\n \n\n\n 26,745\nfollowers\n\n\n \n \n Eric Arthur Blair\n \n , better known by his pen name\n \n George Orwell\n \n , was an English author and journalist. His work is marked by keen intelligence and wit, a profound awareness of social injustice, an intense opposition to totalitarianism, a passion for clarity in language, and a belief in democratic socialism.\n\n
\n
\n In addition to his literary career Orwell served as a police officer with the Indian Imperial\n \n \n \n \n \n Eric Arthur Blair\n \n , better known by his pen name\n \n George Orwell\n \n , was an English author and journalist. His work is marked by keen intelligence and wit, a profound awareness of social injustice, an intense opposition to totalitarianism, a passion for clarity in language, and a belief in democratic socialism.\n
\n
\n In addition to his literary career Orwell served as a police officer with the Indian Imperial Police in Burma from 1922-1927 and fought with the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War from 1936-1937. Orwell was severely wounded when he was shot through his throat. Later the organization that he had joined when he joined the Republican cause, The Workers Party of Marxist Unification (POUM), was painted by the pro-Soviet Communists as a Trotskyist organization (Trotsky was Joseph Stalin\'s enemy) and disbanded. Orwell and his wife were accused of "rabid Trotskyism" and tried in absentia in Barcelona, along with other leaders of the POUM, in 1938. However by then they had escaped from Spain and returned to England.\n
\n
\n Between 1941 and 1943, Orwell worked on propaganda for the BBC. In 1943, he became literary editor of the Tribune, a weekly left-wing magazine. He was a prolific polemical journalist, article writer, literary critic, reviewer, poet and writer of fiction, and, considered perhaps the twentieth century\'s best chronicler of English culture.\n
\n
\n Orwell is best known for the dystopian novel\n \n Nineteen Eighty-Four\n \n (published in 1949) and the satirical novella\n \n Animal Farm\n \n (1945) — they have together sold more copies than any two books by any other twentieth-century author. His 1938 book\n \n Homage to Catalonia\n \n , an account of his experiences as a volunteer on the Republican side during the Spanish Civil War, together with numerous essays on politics, literature, language, and culture, are widely acclaimed.\n
\n
\n Orwell\'s influence on contemporary culture, popular and political, continues decades after his death. Several of his neologisms, along with the term "Orwellian" — now a byword for any oppressive or manipulative social phenomenon opposed to a free society — have entered the vernacular.\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n ...more\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n Quotes from 1984\n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n \n “Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood.”\n \n\n\n —\n \n 12451 likes\n \n \n\n\n\n \n “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”\n \n\n \n More quotes…\n \n\n —\n \n 8038 likes\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n ©\n2018\nGoodreads Inc\n\n\n\n\n
\n- \n \n about us\n \n
\n- \n \n advertise\n \n
\n- \n \n author program\n \n
\n- \n \n jobs\n \n
\n- \n \n api\n \n
\n- \n \n our blog\n \n
\n- \n \n authors & advertisers blog\n \n
\n- \n \n terms\n \n
\n- \n \n privacy\n \n
\n- \n \n help\n \n
\n- \n \n switch to:\n \n \n mobile version\n \n
\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.\n
\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n' In [14]: d.select("meta[property='og:title']")[0]['content'] Out[14]: '1984' Lets get everything we want... In [15]: d=BeautifulSoup(fstuff.text, 'html.parser') print( "title", d.select_one("meta[property='og:title']")['content'],"\n", "isbn", d.select("meta[property='books:isbn']")[0]['content'],"\n", "type", d.select("meta[property='og:type']")[0]['content'],"\n", "author", d.select("meta[property='books:author']")[0]['content'],"\n", "average rating", d.select_one("span.average").text,"\n", "ratingCount", d.select("meta[itemprop='ratingCount']")[0]["content"],"\n", "reviewCount", d.select_one("span.count")["title"] ) title 1984 isbn 9780451524935 type books.book author https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3706.George_Orwell average rating 4.16 ratingCount 2402209 reviewCount 53335 Ok, now that we know what to do, lets wrap our fetching into a proper script. So that we dont overwhelm their servers, we will only fetch 5 from each page, but you get the idea... We'll segue of a bit to explore new style format strings. See https://pyformat.info for more info. In [16]: "list{:0>2}.txt".format(3) Out[16]: 'list03.txt' In [17]: a = "4" b = 4 class Four: def __str__(self): return "Fourteen" c=Four() In [18]: "The hazy cat jumped over the {} and {} and {}".format(a, b, c) Out[18]: 'The hazy cat jumped over the 4 and 4 and Fourteen' 4. Set up a pipeline for fetching and parsing¶Ok lets get back to the fetching... In [19]: fetched=[] for i in range(1,3): with open("files/list{:0>2}.txt".format(i)) as fd: counter=0 for bookurl_line in fd: if counter > 4: break bookurl=bookurl_line.strip() stuff=requests.get(URLSTART+bookurl) filetowrite=bookurl.split('/')[-1] filetowrite="files/"+str(i)+"_"+filetowrite+".html" print("FTW", filetowrite) fd=open(filetowrite,"w", encoding='utf-8') fd.write(stuff.text) fd.close() fetched.append(filetowrite) time.sleep(2) counter=counter+1 print(fetched) FTW files/1_2767052-the-hunger-games.html FTW files/1_2.Harry_Potter_and_the_Order_of_the_Phoenix.html FTW files/1_2657.To_Kill_a_Mockingbird.html FTW files/1_1885.Pride_and_Prejudice.html FTW files/1_41865.Twilight.html FTW files/2_5470.1984.html FTW files/2_4989.The_Red_Tent.html FTW files/2_37435.The_Secret_Life_of_Bees.html FTW files/2_5.Harry_Potter_and_the_Prisoner_of_Azkaban.html FTW files/2_7171637-clockwork-angel.html ['files/1_2767052-the-hunger-games.html', 'files/1_2.Harry_Potter_and_the_Order_of_the_Phoenix.html', 'files/1_2657.To_Kill_a_Mockingbird.html', 'files/1_1885.Pride_and_Prejudice.html', 'files/1_41865.Twilight.html', 'files/2_5470.1984.html', 'files/2_4989.The_Red_Tent.html', 'files/2_37435.The_Secret_Life_of_Bees.html', 'files/2_5.Harry_Potter_and_the_Prisoner_of_Azkaban.html', 'files/2_7171637-clockwork-angel.html'] Ok we are off to parse each one of the html pages we fetched. We have provided the skeleton of the code and the code to parse the year, since it is a bit more complex...see the difference in the screenshots above. In [20]: import re yearre = r'\d{4}' def get_year(d): if d.select_one("nobr.greyText"): return d.select_one("nobr.greyText").text.strip().split()[-1][:-1] else: thetext=d.select("div#details div.row")[1].text.strip() rowmatch=re.findall(yearre, thetext) if len(rowmatch) > 0: rowtext=rowmatch[0].strip() else: rowtext="NA" return rowtext ExerciseYour job is to fill in the code to get the genres. In [21]: def get_genres(d): # your code here genres=d.select("div.elementList div.left a") glist=[] for g in genres: glist.append(g['href']) return glist In [22]: listofdicts=[] for filetoread in fetched: print(filetoread) td={} with open(filetoread) as fd: datext = fd.read() d=BeautifulSoup(datext, 'html.parser') td['title']=d.select_one("meta[property='og:title']")['content'] td['isbn']=d.select_one("meta[property='books:isbn']")['content'] td['booktype']=d.select_one("meta[property='og:type']")['content'] td['author']=d.select_one("meta[property='books:author']")['content'] td['rating']=d.select_one("span.average").text td['ratingCount']=d.select_one("meta[itemprop='ratingCount']")["content"] td['reviewCount']=d.select_one("span.count")["title"] td['year'] = get_year(d) td['file']=filetoread glist = get_genres(d) td['genres']="|".join(glist) listofdicts.append(td) files/1_2767052-the-hunger-games.html files/1_2.Harry_Potter_and_the_Order_of_the_Phoenix.html files/1_2657.To_Kill_a_Mockingbird.html files/1_1885.Pride_and_Prejudice.html files/1_41865.Twilight.html files/2_5470.1984.html files/2_4989.The_Red_Tent.html files/2_37435.The_Secret_Life_of_Bees.html files/2_5.Harry_Potter_and_the_Prisoner_of_Azkaban.html files/2_7171637-clockwork-angel.html In [23]: listofdicts[0] Out[23]: {'title': 'The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)', 'isbn': '9780439023481', 'booktype': 'books.book', 'author': 'https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/153394.Suzanne_Collins', 'rating': '4.33', 'ratingCount': '5491176', 'reviewCount': '160373', 'year': '2008', 'file': 'files/1_2767052-the-hunger-games.html', 'genres': '/genres/young-adult|/genres/fiction|/genres/science-fiction|/genres/dystopia|/genres/fantasy|/genres/science-fiction'} Finally lets write all this stuff into a csv file which we will use to do analysis. In [24]: df = pd.DataFrame.from_records(listofdicts) df.head() Out[24]: .dataframe tbody tr th:only-of-type { vertical-align: middle; } .dataframe tbody tr th { vertical-align: top; } .dataframe thead th { text-align: right; } author booktype file genres isbn rating ratingCount reviewCount title year 0 https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/153394.S... books.book files/1_2767052-the-hunger-games.html /genres/young-adult|/genres/fiction|/genres/sc... 9780439023481 4.33 5491176 160373 The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1) 2008 1 https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1077326.... books.book files/1_2.Harry_Potter_and_the_Order_of_the_Ph... /genres/fantasy|/genres/young-adult|/genres/fi... 9780439358071 4.48 2030257 33033 Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Har... 2003 2 https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1825.Har... books.book files/1_2657.To_Kill_a_Mockingbird.html /genres/classics|/genres/fiction|/genres/histo... 9780061120084 4.27 3722962 79058 To Kill a Mockingbird (To Kill a Mockingbird, #1) 1960 3 https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1265.Jan... books.book files/1_1885.Pride_and_Prejudice.html /genres/classics|/genres/fiction|/genres/romance 9780679783268 4.25 2438138 54013 Pride and Prejudice 1813 4 https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/941441.S... books.book files/1_41865.Twilight.html /genres/young-adult|/genres/fantasy|/genres/ro... 9780316015844 3.58 4262416 97797 Twilight (Twilight, #1) 2005 In [25]: df.to_csv("files/meta.csv", index=False, header=True)
\n You reading lacks nuance. Never wrote, taxes are ALWAYS bad.\n
\n
\n But when sales tax has incr\n \n \n \n ...more\n \n
\n \n Sep 27, 2018 03:07PM\n \n
\n \n Sep 28, 2018 06:20PM\n \n